PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JOET vs. EEMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JOET vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JOET achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 40.25% return.


JOET

1D
0.00%
1M
5.74%
YTD
7.43%
6M
6.85%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*

EEMO

1D
-1.32%
1M
18.59%
YTD
40.25%
6M
41.33%
1Y
57.41%
3Y*
25.30%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
8.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JOET vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JOET
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF
7.43%11.89%24.01%16.34%-18.04%26.79%6.00%
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
40.25%10.99%9.88%13.90%-18.73%-5.57%8.10%

Correlation

The correlation between JOET and EEMO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020

0.59

The correlation between JOET and EEMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

JOET vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JOET
EEMO

Technology

23.1%
43.8%

Industrials

22.6%
11.5%

Financial Services

15.1%
18.0%

Healthcare

11.1%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
3.2%

Energy

5.8%
2.5%

Communication Services

4.0%
1.5%

Basic Materials

3.2%
12.9%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
1.2%

Utilities

0.8%
2.0%

Technology

JOET
23.1%
EEMO
43.8%

Industrials

JOET
22.6%
EEMO
11.5%

Financial Services

JOET
15.1%
EEMO
18.0%

Healthcare

JOET
11.1%
EEMO
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

JOET
10.3%
EEMO
3.2%

Energy

JOET
5.8%
EEMO
2.5%

Communication Services

JOET
4.0%
EEMO
1.5%

Basic Materials

JOET
3.2%
EEMO
12.9%

Real Estate

JOET
2.4%
EEMO
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

JOET
1.6%
EEMO
1.2%

Utilities

JOET
0.8%
EEMO
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JOET vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JOET
JOET Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
JOET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JOET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
JOET Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
JOET Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
JOET Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JOET vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JOETEEMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.46

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

3.91

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.19

15.67

-10.49

JOET vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JOET Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JOET and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JOETEEMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

2.36

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.37

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.13

+0.58

Drawdowns

JOET vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JOET drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum EEMO drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOET and EEMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JOETEEMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.58%

-48.47%

+21.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-14.75%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.55%

-26.06%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-34.03%

+7.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.32%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-20.17%

+12.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

3.67%

-0.96%

Volatility

JOET vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) is 3.50%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that JOET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JOETEEMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

14.32%

-10.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

22.10%

-11.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

24.45%

-11.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.70%

19.33%

-1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

21.59%

-4.07%

JOET vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JOET has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

JOET vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

JOET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than EEMO's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.64%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
JOET
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF
0.61%0.65%0.71%1.32%1.25%0.42%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JOET and EEMO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMO has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to JOET (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOET dropped -26.58% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

On 5-year performance, JOET leads with 10.88% vs 7.19% for EEMO. On fees, JOET is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JOET has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JOET has performed better with a 10.88% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JOET is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EEMO.

EEMO has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.61% for JOET.

JOET tracks Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index, while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JOET and 0.31% for EEMO.

EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JOET and EEMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer