JOET vs. ARKK
JOET (Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF) and ARKK (ARK Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JOET is a Quality Factor fund tracking the Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index, while ARKK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by ARK. JOET is passively managed, while ARKK is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JOET returned 9.44%/yr vs -9.65%/yr for ARKK. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JOET charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKK.
Performance
JOET vs. ARKK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JOET achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly higher than ARKK's -7.38% return.
JOET
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- YTD
- 8.43%
- 1Y
- 13.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.04%
ARKK
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -12.32%
- 6M
- -4.85%
- YTD
- -7.38%
- 1Y
- 0.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.25%
- 5Y*
- -9.65%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $356.24M | $389.65M | $523.48M | |
| $871.40K | $1.08M | $923.13K |
JOET vs. ARKK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF | 8.43% | 11.89% | 24.01% | 16.34% | -18.04% | 26.79% | 5.06% |
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | -7.38% | 35.49% | 8.40% | 69.04% | -66.97% | -23.60% | 24.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between JOET and ARKK is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020 | 0.70 |
The correlation between JOET and ARKK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
JOET vs. ARKK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JOET
ARKK
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Technology
JOET
ARKK
Industrials
JOET
ARKK
Financial Services
JOET
ARKK
Healthcare
JOET
ARKK
Consumer Cyclical
JOET
ARKK
Energy
JOET
ARKK
-
Communication Services
JOET
ARKK
Basic Materials
JOET
ARKK
-
Real Estate
JOET
ARKK
-
Consumer Defensive
JOET
ARKK
-
Utilities
JOET
ARKK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JOET vs. ARKK — Risk / Return Rank
JOET
ARKK
JOET vs. ARKK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JOET | ARKK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.01 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | -0.17 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.20 | -0.35 | +4.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JOET vs. ARKK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JOET drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum ARKK drawdown of -80.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOET and ARKK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JOET | ARKK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.58% | -80.97% | +54.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -31.35% | +20.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.55% | -39.56% | +20.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -76.27% | +49.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -53.87% | +52.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -30.38% | +23.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 15.57% | -12.82% |
Volatility
JOET vs. ARKK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) is 3.12%, while ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) has a volatility of 10.19%. This indicates that JOET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JOET | ARKK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 10.19% | -7.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.02% | 27.72% | -16.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.06% | 36.83% | -22.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 46.55% | -28.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 40.48% | -23.03% |
JOET vs. ARKK - Expense Ratio Comparison
JOET has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
JOET vs. ARKK - Dividend Comparison
JOET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, while ARKK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.55% | 1.64% | 0.38% | 3.14% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 2.27% |
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 1.32% | 1.25% | 0.42% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JOET and ARKK have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKK has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to JOET (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOET dropped -26.58% vs ARKK's -80.97%.
On 5-year performance, JOET leads with 9.44% vs -9.65% for ARKK. On fees, JOET is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JOET has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JOET has performed better with a 9.44% return vs -9.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JOET is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKK.
JOET has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for ARKK.
JOET is categorized as Quality Factor, while ARKK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JOET and 0.75% for ARKK.
JOET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JOET and ARKK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer