JOET vs. QQQ
JOET (Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JOET is a Momentum fund tracking the Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JOET returned 11.09%/yr vs 18.43%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JOET charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
JOET vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JOET achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.62% return.
JOET
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 7.54%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 6M
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 21.97%
JOET vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF | 7.43% | 11.89% | 24.01% | 16.34% | -18.04% | 26.79% | 6.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.62% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 8.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between JOET and QQQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020 | 0.84 |
The correlation between JOET and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
JOET vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JOET
QQQ
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
JOET
QQQ
Industrials
JOET
QQQ
Financial Services
JOET
QQQ
Healthcare
JOET
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
JOET
QQQ
Energy
JOET
QQQ
Communication Services
JOET
QQQ
Basic Materials
JOET
QQQ
Real Estate
JOET
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
JOET
QQQ
Utilities
JOET
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JOET vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
JOET
QQQ
JOET vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JOET | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 2.73 | -1.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 3.55 | -1.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.47 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 3.71 | -2.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.56 | 14.30 | -8.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JOET | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 2.73 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.83 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.41 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
JOET vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JOET drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOET and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JOET | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.58% | -82.97% | +56.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -11.96% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.55% | -22.77% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -35.12% | +8.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.19% | -32.79% | +25.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 3.11% | -0.40% |
Volatility
JOET vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) is 3.56%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that JOET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JOET | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 4.48% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.40% | 12.11% | -1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.45% | 15.95% | -2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 22.39% | -4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 22.30% | -4.77% |
JOET vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JOET has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
JOET vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
JOET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 1.32% | 1.25% | 0.42% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JOET and QQQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to JOET (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOET dropped -26.58% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 18.43% vs 11.09% for JOET. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JOET has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 18.43% return vs 11.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for JOET.
JOET has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
JOET is categorized as Momentum, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. JOET tracks Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JOET and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JOET and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer