JOET vs. AMZA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JOET (Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF) and AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JOET is a Momentum fund tracking the Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index, while AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. JOET is passively managed, while AMZA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JOET returned 10.88%/yr vs 19.41%/yr for AMZA. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JOET charges 0.29%/yr vs 2.01%/yr for AMZA.

Performance

JOET vs. AMZA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JOET achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than AMZA's 22.22% return.

JOET

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.74%
• YTD: 7.43%
• 6M: 6.85%
• 1Y: 14.02%
• 3Y*: 18.62%
• 5Y*: 10.88%
• 10Y*: —

AMZA

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -0.92%
• YTD: 22.22%
• 6M: 20.41%
• 1Y: 17.55%
• 3Y*: 22.02%
• 5Y*: 19.41%
• 10Y*: 4.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JOET vs. AMZA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF	7.43%	11.89%	24.01%	16.34%	-18.04%	26.79%	6.00%
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF	22.22%	0.17%	30.90%	23.35%	33.20%	51.22%	7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between JOET and AMZA is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020	0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between JOET and AMZA has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JOET vs. AMZA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JOET	AMZA
Technology	23.1%	-
Industrials	22.6%	-
Financial Services	15.1%	-
Healthcare	11.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	-
Energy	5.8%	99.8%
Communication Services	4.0%	-
Basic Materials	3.2%	-
Real Estate	2.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	-
Utilities	0.8%	0.2%

Return for Risk

JOET vs. AMZA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JOET

JOET Risk / Return Rank: 29
JOET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
JOET Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
JOET Omega Ratio Rank: 27
JOET Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
JOET Martin Ratio Rank: 34

AMZA

AMZA Risk / Return Rank: 27
AMZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
AMZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
AMZA Omega Ratio Rank: 25
AMZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
AMZA Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JOET vs. AMZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JOET	AMZA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.00	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	1.48	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.17	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	1.45	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.19	3.65	+1.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JOET vs. AMZA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JOET Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the AMZA Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JOET and AMZA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JOET	AMZA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	1.00	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.76	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	-0.02	+0.73

Drawdowns

JOET vs. AMZA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JOET drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum AMZA drawdown of -91.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOET and AMZA.

Drawdown Indicators

	JOET	AMZA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.58%	-91.46%	+64.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.42%	-12.16%	+1.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.55%	-18.56%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.58%	-25.15%	-1.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-86.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-10.19%	+10.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.18%	-45.02%	+37.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	4.82%	-2.11%

Volatility

JOET vs. AMZA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) is 3.50%, while InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that JOET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JOET	AMZA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.50%	5.80%	-2.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.37%	13.40%	-3.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.45%	17.72%	-4.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.70%	25.84%	-8.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.52%	37.25%	-19.73%

JOET vs. AMZA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JOET has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZA's 2.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

JOET vs. AMZA - Dividend Comparison

JOET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than AMZA's 8.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF	8.02%	8.81%	7.29%	9.40%	7.65%	10.24%	22.13%	19.47%	34.46%	24.16%	18.36%	18.21%
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF	0.61%	0.65%	0.71%	1.32%	1.25%	0.42%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JOET and AMZA in my portfolio?

JOET and AMZA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JOET or AMZA?

AMZA has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to JOET (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOET dropped -26.58% vs AMZA's -91.46%.

Which ETF is better, JOET or AMZA?

On 5-year performance, AMZA leads with 19.41% vs 10.88% for JOET. On fees, JOET is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JOET has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JOET or AMZA?

Over the 5-year period, AMZA has performed better with a 19.41% return vs 10.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JOET or AMZA?

JOET is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JOET or AMZA?

AMZA has the higher dividend yield at 8.02%, compared with 0.61% for JOET.

What is the main difference between JOET and AMZA?

JOET is categorized as Momentum, while AMZA is MLPs. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JOET and 2.01% for AMZA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JOET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.