AMZA vs. GCC
AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) and GCC (WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while GCC is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMZA returned 4.73%/yr vs 6.00%/yr for GCC. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZA charges 2.01%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for GCC.
Performance
AMZA vs. GCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 19.38% return, which is significantly higher than GCC's 9.55% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZA has underperformed GCC with an annualized return of 4.73%, while GCC has yielded a comparatively higher 6.00% annualized return.
AMZA
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -5.71%
- YTD
- 19.38%
- 6M
- 19.96%
- 1Y
- 13.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.59%
- 5Y*
- 18.45%
- 10Y*
- 4.73%
GCC
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -8.49%
- YTD
- 9.55%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 22.24%
- 3Y*
- 15.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.56%
- 10Y*
- 6.00%
AMZA vs. GCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 19.38% | 0.17% | 30.90% | 23.35% | 33.20% | 51.22% | -49.25% | 6.27% | -26.78% | -6.90% |
GCC WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund | 9.55% | 20.01% | 15.13% | -3.72% | 7.74% | 19.96% | 1.38% | 7.07% | -8.69% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZA and GCC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014 | 0.38 |
The correlation between AMZA and GCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZA vs. GCC — Risk / Return Rank
AMZA
GCC
AMZA vs. GCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZA | GCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.25 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 1.78 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.79 | 6.32 | -3.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZA vs. GCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than GCC's maximum drawdown of -63.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and GCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZA | GCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.46% | -63.19% | -28.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -12.53% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.56% | -12.53% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -27.07% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.84% | -32.67% | -54.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.27% | -12.53% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.86% | -34.84% | -10.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.95% | 3.54% | +1.41% |
Volatility
AMZA vs. GCC - Volatility Comparison
InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) at 3.98%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZA | GCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 3.98% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.40% | 15.21% | -1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.75% | 17.08% | +0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.64% | 16.92% | +8.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.21% | 14.79% | +22.42% |
AMZA vs. GCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GCC's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZA vs. GCC - Dividend Comparison
AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.38%, more than GCC's 6.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 8.38% | 8.81% | 7.29% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
GCC WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund | 6.06% | 6.64% | 3.51% | 3.68% | 22.49% | 9.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZA and GCC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZA has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to GCC (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZA dropped -91.46% vs GCC's -63.19%.
On 10-year performance, GCC leads with 6.00% vs 4.73% for AMZA. On fees, GCC is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, GCC has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GCC has performed better with a 6.00% return vs 4.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GCC is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.
AMZA has the higher dividend yield at 8.38%, compared with 6.06% for GCC.
AMZA is categorized as MLPs, while GCC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 2.01% for AMZA and 0.55% for GCC.
GCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZA and GCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer