PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMZA vs. UMI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AMZA and UMI is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

AMZA vs. UMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
8.20%
22.17%
AMZA
UMI

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMZA:

1.57

UMI:

3.09

Sortino Ratio

AMZA:

2.12

UMI:

4.06

Omega Ratio

AMZA:

1.27

UMI:

1.55

Calmar Ratio

AMZA:

0.69

UMI:

4.23

Martin Ratio

AMZA:

7.47

UMI:

20.68

Ulcer Index

AMZA:

4.12%

UMI:

2.10%

Daily Std Dev

AMZA:

19.63%

UMI:

14.05%

Max Drawdown

AMZA:

-91.46%

UMI:

-48.08%

Current Drawdown

AMZA:

-27.22%

UMI:

-6.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 29.95% return, which is significantly lower than UMI's 43.34% return.


AMZA

YTD

29.95%

1M

-5.96%

6M

8.20%

1Y

30.73%

5Y*

9.69%

10Y*

-2.17%

UMI

YTD

43.34%

1M

-6.07%

6M

21.55%

1Y

43.44%

5Y*

17.28%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMZA vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.


AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
Expense ratio chart for AMZA: current value at 2.01% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.01%
Expense ratio chart for UMI: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMZA vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMZA, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.573.09
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMZA, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.124.06
The chart of Omega ratio for AMZA, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.271.55
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMZA, currently valued at 2.46, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.464.23
The chart of Martin ratio for AMZA, currently valued at 7.46, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.007.4720.68
AMZA
UMI

The current AMZA Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the UMI Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZA and UMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.57
3.09
AMZA
UMI

Dividends

AMZA vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison

AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, more than UMI's 3.86% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
6.69%9.40%7.65%10.24%22.13%19.47%34.46%24.16%18.36%18.21%
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
3.86%4.67%4.78%3.37%2.18%2.47%2.48%0.15%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AMZA vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than UMI's maximum drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and UMI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-9.65%
-6.20%
AMZA
UMI

Volatility

AMZA vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison

InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) at 6.56%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
8.31%
6.56%
AMZA
UMI
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab