PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMZA vs. UMI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


AMZAUMI
YTD Return18.48%12.80%
1Y Return38.36%28.68%
3Y Return (Ann)28.17%22.13%
5Y Return (Ann)5.29%12.74%
Sharpe Ratio1.991.95
Daily Std Dev18.96%13.85%
Max Drawdown-91.46%-48.08%
Current Drawdown-33.65%-0.38%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between AMZA and UMI is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

AMZA vs. UMI - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 18.48% return, which is significantly higher than UMI's 12.80% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
22.02%
18.15%
AMZA
UMI

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


InfraCap MLP ETF

USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF

AMZA vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.


AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
Expense ratio chart for AMZA: current value at 2.01% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.01%
Expense ratio chart for UMI: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMZA vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMZA, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.99
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMZA, currently valued at 2.69, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.002.69
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AMZA, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market1.001.502.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMZA, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.001.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AMZA, currently valued at 11.88, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0011.88
UMI
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UMI, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.95
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for UMI, currently valued at 2.71, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.002.71
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for UMI, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market1.001.502.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for UMI, currently valued at 2.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.002.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for UMI, currently valued at 14.03, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0014.03

AMZA vs. UMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZA Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which roughly equals the UMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of AMZA and UMI.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
1.99
1.95
AMZA
UMI

Dividends

AMZA vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison

AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than UMI's 4.50% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
7.27%9.40%7.65%10.24%22.13%19.47%34.46%24.16%18.36%18.21%
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
4.50%4.67%4.78%3.37%2.18%2.47%2.48%0.15%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AMZA vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than UMI's maximum drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and UMI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-2.63%
-0.38%
AMZA
UMI

Volatility

AMZA vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison

InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) at 3.43%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
5.68%
3.43%
AMZA
UMI