AMZA vs. UMI
Compare and contrast key facts about InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI).
AMZA and UMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMZA is an actively managed fund by Virtus Investment Partners. It was launched on Oct 7, 2014. UMI is an actively managed fund by Wainwright, Inc.. It was launched on Mar 24, 2021.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMZA or UMI.
Key characteristics
| AMZA | UMI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 26.62% | 42.62% |
| 1Y Return | 30.28% | 49.92% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 24.59% | 22.94% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.96% | 17.68% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.60 | 3.86 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.21 | 5.26 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.27 | 1.68 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.66 | 8.49 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.50 | 30.93 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.03% | 1.60% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.86% | 12.78% |
| Max Drawdown | -91.46% | -48.08% |
| Current Drawdown | -29.09% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZA and UMI is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AMZA vs. UMI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 26.62% return, which is significantly lower than UMI's 42.62% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMZA vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMZA vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMZA vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison
AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, more than UMI's 3.98% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 7.35% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 3.98% | 4.67% | 4.78% | 3.37% | 2.18% | 2.47% | 2.48% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AMZA vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than UMI's maximum drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and UMI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AMZA vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison
InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) at 4.27%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.