PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZA vs. DIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZA vs. DIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 19.38% return, which is significantly higher than DIV's 11.37% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZA has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 4.73%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 3.96% annualized return.


AMZA

1D
-0.17%
1M
-5.71%
YTD
19.38%
6M
19.96%
1Y
13.76%
3Y*
21.59%
5Y*
18.45%
10Y*
4.73%

DIV

1D
0.37%
1M
-3.42%
YTD
11.37%
6M
11.46%
1Y
13.92%
3Y*
12.17%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
3.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZA vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
19.38%0.17%30.90%23.35%33.20%51.22%-49.25%6.27%-26.78%-6.90%
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
11.37%3.10%11.27%-1.73%-3.92%30.60%-22.85%14.50%-6.60%9.90%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZA and DIV is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.60

The correlation between AMZA and DIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AMZA vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMZA
DIV

Energy

99.8%
23.2%

Utilities

0.2%
11.7%

Basic Materials

-

4.3%

Communication Services

-

6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.8%

Financial Services

-

3.8%

Healthcare

-

3.4%

Industrials

-

11.9%

Real Estate

-

20.1%

Technology

-

-

Energy

AMZA
99.8%
DIV
23.2%

Utilities

AMZA
0.2%
DIV
11.7%

Basic Materials

AMZA

-

DIV
4.3%

Communication Services

AMZA

-

DIV
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

AMZA

-

DIV
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

AMZA

-

DIV
10.8%

Financial Services

AMZA

-

DIV
3.8%

Healthcare

AMZA

-

DIV
3.4%

Industrials

AMZA

-

DIV
11.9%

Real Estate

AMZA

-

DIV
20.1%

Technology

AMZA

-

DIV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZA vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZA
AMZA Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
AMZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZA Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZA Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

DIV
DIV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZA vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZADIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.23

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

2.67

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

7.27

-4.48

AMZA vs. DIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZA Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the DIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZA and DIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZA vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, which is greater than DIV's maximum drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and DIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZADIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.46%

-52.74%

-38.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.16%

-5.23%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.56%

-12.33%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.15%

-21.14%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.84%

-52.74%

-34.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.27%

-3.42%

-8.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.86%

-7.01%

-37.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

1.92%

+3.03%

Volatility

AMZA vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison

InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.13%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZADIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

3.13%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.40%

7.35%

+6.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.75%

10.52%

+7.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.64%

13.67%

+11.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.21%

18.00%

+19.21%

AMZA vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMZA vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison

AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.38%, more than DIV's 6.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
8.38%8.81%7.29%9.40%7.65%10.24%22.13%19.47%34.46%24.16%18.36%18.21%
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
6.89%7.30%5.74%7.13%6.62%5.24%8.01%7.65%7.08%5.92%6.78%8.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZA and DIV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZA has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to DIV (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZA dropped -91.46% vs DIV's -52.74%.

On 10-year performance, AMZA leads with 4.73% vs 3.96% for DIV. On fees, DIV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AMZA has performed better with a 4.73% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.

AMZA has the higher dividend yield at 8.38%, compared with 6.89% for DIV.

AMZA is categorized as MLPs, while DIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Global X. Their fees differ too: 2.01% for AMZA and 0.45% for DIV.

DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZA and DIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer