AMZA vs. EMO
Compare and contrast key facts about InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO).
AMZA is an actively managed fund by Virtus Investment Partners. It was launched on Oct 7, 2014. EMO is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 10, 2011.
Performance
AMZA vs. EMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AMZA vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 19.38% | 0.17% | 30.90% | 23.35% | 33.20% | 51.22% | -49.25% | 6.27% | -26.78% | -6.90% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 20.88% | 7.38% | 44.45% | 31.76% | 40.13% | 74.70% | -64.47% | 19.60% | -25.73% | 0.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZA achieves a 19.38% return, which is significantly lower than EMO's 20.88% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZA has underperformed EMO with an annualized return of 7.88%, while EMO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.52% annualized return.
AMZA
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 19.38%
- 6M
- 20.02%
- 1Y
- 5.74%
- 3Y*
- 22.86%
- 5Y*
- 23.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
EMO
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 20.88%
- 6M
- 23.15%
- 1Y
- 19.30%
- 3Y*
- 34.99%
- 5Y*
- 33.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMZA vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZA has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 13.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AMZA vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank
AMZA
EMO
AMZA vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZA | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 0.91 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.47 | 1.28 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.20 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 1.07 | -0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.55 | 3.23 | -2.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZA | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 0.91 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 1.25 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.23 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.12 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZA and EMO is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AMZA vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison
AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%, less than EMO's 8.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 7.88% | 8.81% | 7.29% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 8.11% | 9.41% | 7.16% | 6.79% | 6.71% | 6.71% | 15.82% | 10.94% | 16.39% | 10.85% | 9.76% | 11.88% |
Drawdowns
AMZA vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZA drawdown since its inception was -91.46%, roughly equal to the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZA and EMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZA | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.46% | -95.06% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.90% | -18.81% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -28.59% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.84% | -93.02% | +6.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.28% | -2.55% | -9.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.54% | -32.27% | -13.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.91% | 6.22% | +3.69% |
Volatility
AMZA vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison
InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) at 4.63%. This indicates that AMZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AMZA | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 4.63% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 11.12% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.23% | 21.39% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 26.78% | -0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.45% | 41.41% | -3.96% |