JMOM vs. XSVM
JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - JMOM tracks the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index while XSVM tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMOM returned 13.81%/yr vs 10.26%/yr for XSVM. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JMOM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for XSVM.
Performance
JMOM vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMOM achieves a 20.54% return, which is significantly lower than XSVM's 27.31% return.
JMOM
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- 6M
- 16.11%
- YTD
- 20.54%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 25.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.83%
XSVM
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- YTD
- 27.31%
- 1Y
- 43.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.26%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.82M | $11.76M | $9.25M | |
| $2.64M | $2.37M | $2.08M |
JMOM vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 20.54% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.36% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 27.31% | 7.47% | 2.30% | 20.20% | -13.63% | 56.36% | 5.08% | 30.01% | -12.33% | 5.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMOM and XSVM is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.59 |
The correlation between JMOM and XSVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JMOM vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JMOM
XSVM
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
JMOM
XSVM
Industrials
JMOM
XSVM
Healthcare
JMOM
XSVM
Financial Services
JMOM
XSVM
Consumer Cyclical
JMOM
XSVM
Communication Services
JMOM
XSVM
Consumer Defensive
JMOM
XSVM
Energy
JMOM
XSVM
Real Estate
JMOM
XSVM
Utilities
JMOM
XSVM
Basic Materials
JMOM
XSVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMOM vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank
JMOM
XSVM
JMOM vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMOM | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.43 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 4.32 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.51 | 13.79 | -0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMOM vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and XSVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMOM | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -62.57% | +28.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.02% | -10.08% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -26.21% | +6.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | -26.21% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | -0.28% | -3.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -11.48% | +5.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 3.15% | -0.99% |
Volatility
JMOM vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) at 4.25%. This indicates that JMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMOM | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 4.25% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.02% | 11.78% | +2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.54% | 17.83% | -1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 22.34% | -3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 25.01% | -4.84% |
JMOM vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMOM vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison
JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than XSVM's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.75% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.73% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMOM and XSVM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMOM has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to XSVM (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMOM dropped -34.31% vs XSVM's -62.57%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 13.81% vs 10.26% for XSVM. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, XSVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 13.81% return vs 10.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for XSVM.
XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.75% for JMOM.
JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JMOM and 0.37% for XSVM.
XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMOM and XSVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer