XSVM vs. RWJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ).
XSVM and RWJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSVM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. RWJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. Both XSVM and RWJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XSVM or RWJ.
Correlation
The correlation between XSVM and RWJ is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XSVM vs. RWJ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XSVM:
0.23
RWJ:
0.64
XSVM:
0.50
RWJ:
1.05
XSVM:
1.06
RWJ:
1.12
XSVM:
0.41
RWJ:
1.35
XSVM:
0.88
RWJ:
3.38
XSVM:
5.59%
RWJ:
4.06%
XSVM:
21.89%
RWJ:
21.59%
XSVM:
-62.57%
RWJ:
-55.97%
XSVM:
-9.65%
RWJ:
-7.72%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSVM achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly lower than RWJ's 11.25% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XSVM having a 10.01% annualized return and RWJ not far ahead at 10.44%.
XSVM
2.48%
-5.31%
5.64%
2.46%
11.75%
10.01%
RWJ
11.25%
-2.40%
14.26%
11.23%
16.38%
10.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XSVM vs. RWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XSVM and RWJ have an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XSVM vs. RWJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XSVM vs. RWJ - Dividend Comparison
XSVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than RWJ's 0.91% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.29% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% | 1.32% | 1.15% |
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 0.91% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 0.61% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.74% | 0.57% | 1.27% |
Drawdowns
XSVM vs. RWJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSVM drawdown since its inception was -62.57%, which is greater than RWJ's maximum drawdown of -55.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVM and RWJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XSVM vs. RWJ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) have volatilities of 5.91% and 6.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.