PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSVM vs. XSMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSVM vs. XSMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSVM achieves a 25.81% return, which is significantly higher than XSMO's 20.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XSVM having a 13.34% annualized return and XSMO not far ahead at 13.85%.


XSVM

1D
-0.35%
1M
2.37%
6M
17.50%
YTD
25.81%
1Y
41.62%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
13.34%
ALL TIME*
9.32%

XSMO

1D
-0.23%
1M
-4.08%
6M
14.13%
YTD
20.85%
1Y
30.10%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
13.85%
ALL TIME*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$20.63M$21.90M$21.28M
$2.60M$2.40M$2.07M

XSVM vs. XSMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
25.81%7.47%2.30%20.20%-13.63%56.36%5.08%30.01%-12.33%3.62%
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
20.85%9.80%17.45%21.55%-15.44%19.24%21.96%28.65%-3.44%23.95%

Correlation

The correlation between XSVM and XSMO is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005

0.82

The correlation between XSVM and XSMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSVM vs. XSMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSVM
XSMO

Financial Services

45.1%
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

18.1%
9.0%

Real Estate

9.7%
4.6%

Energy

5.7%
2.7%

Industrials

5.3%
19.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
2.5%

Basic Materials

3.0%
6.0%

Technology

2.6%
17.8%

Communication Services

2.6%
4.0%

Utilities

2.1%
3.4%

Healthcare

1.7%
16.9%

Financial Services

XSVM
45.1%
XSMO
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XSVM
18.1%
XSMO
9.0%

Real Estate

XSVM
9.7%
XSMO
4.6%

Energy

XSVM
5.7%
XSMO
2.7%

Industrials

XSVM
5.3%
XSMO
19.8%

Consumer Defensive

XSVM
4.1%
XSMO
2.5%

Basic Materials

XSVM
3.0%
XSMO
6.0%

Technology

XSVM
2.6%
XSMO
17.8%

Communication Services

XSVM
2.6%
XSMO
4.0%

Utilities

XSVM
2.1%
XSMO
3.4%

Healthcare

XSVM
1.7%
XSMO
16.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSVM vs. XSMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XSVM
XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

XSMO
XSMO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XSVM vs. XSMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSVMXSMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.25

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

3.02

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.49

9.15

+3.34

XSVM vs. XSMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the XSMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSVM and XSMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSVM vs. XSMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSVM drawdown since its inception was -62.57%, which is greater than XSMO's maximum drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVM and XSMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSVMXSMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.57%

-58.06%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-9.44%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.21%

-24.76%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.21%

-29.62%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.02%

-39.39%

-9.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-7.34%

+5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.48%

-11.07%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

3.11%

+0.04%

Volatility

XSVM vs. XSMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) is 4.18%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that XSVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSVMXSMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

5.63%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

15.61%

-3.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

19.92%

-2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.33%

22.58%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.00%

24.13%

+0.87%

XSVM vs. XSMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSVM has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than XSMO's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSVM vs. XSMO - Dividend Comparison

XSVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than XSMO's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.55%0.75%0.63%0.96%1.19%0.30%0.82%0.69%0.66%0.27%0.30%0.35%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.75%2.29%1.69%1.31%1.79%1.23%1.21%1.22%2.54%1.90%2.29%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSVM and XSMO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSMO has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to XSVM (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVM dropped -62.57% vs XSMO's -58.06%.

On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 13.85% vs 13.34% for XSVM. On fees, XSMO is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, XSVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 13.85% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSMO is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for XSVM.

XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.55% for XSMO.

XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index, while XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for XSVM and 0.36% for XSMO.

XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSVM and XSMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer