XSVM vs. SPHB

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) and SPHB (Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index, while SPHB is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Beta Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSVM returned 13.34%/yr vs 17.94%/yr for SPHB. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XSVM charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPHB.

Performance

XSVM vs. SPHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSVM achieves a 25.81% return, which is significantly higher than SPHB's 19.95% return. Over the past 10 years, XSVM has underperformed SPHB with an annualized return of 13.34%, while SPHB has yielded a comparatively higher 17.94% annualized return.

XSVM

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 2.37%
• 6M: 17.50%
• YTD: 25.81%
• 1Y: 41.62%
• 3Y*: 14.54%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: 13.34%
• ALL TIME*: 9.32%

SPHB

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -5.41%
• 6M: 15.81%
• YTD: 19.95%
• 1Y: 39.56%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: 14.83%
• 10Y*: 17.94%
• ALL TIME*: 13.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF	$46.45M	$55.30M	$54.87M
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF	$2.60M	$2.40M	$2.07M

XSVM vs. SPHB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF	25.81%	7.47%	2.30%	20.20%	-13.63%	56.36%	5.08%	30.01%	-12.33%	3.62%
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF	19.95%	32.87%	8.48%	33.28%	-20.59%	40.58%	25.56%	33.96%	-15.55%	17.87%

Correlation

The correlation between XSVM and SPHB is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between XSVM and SPHB has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XSVM vs. SPHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XSVM	SPHB
Financial Services	45.1%	14.9%
Consumer Cyclical	18.1%	10.6%
Real Estate	9.7%	-
Energy	5.7%	0.8%
Industrials	5.3%	13.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	0.9%
Basic Materials	3.0%	2.3%
Technology	2.6%	45.0%
Communication Services	2.6%	1.6%
Utilities	2.1%	3.5%
Healthcare	1.7%	5.9%

Return for Risk

XSVM vs. SPHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XSVM

XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 89
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 87

SPHB

SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 65
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XSVM vs. SPHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XSVM	SPHB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	1.43	+0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	1.95	+1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.24	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.91	2.63	+1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.49	9.86	+2.63

XSVM vs. SPHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the SPHB Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSVM and SPHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XSVM vs. SPHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSVM drawdown since its inception was -62.57%, which is greater than SPHB's maximum drawdown of -46.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVM and SPHB.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSVM	SPHB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.57%	-46.84%	-15.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.08%	-14.11%	+4.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.21%	-29.21%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.21%	-31.49%	+5.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.02%	-46.84%	-2.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-10.79%	+9.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.48%	-8.47%	-3.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	3.76%	-0.61%

Volatility

XSVM vs. SPHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) is 4.18%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a volatility of 9.30%. This indicates that XSVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSVM	SPHB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	9.30%	-5.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.73%	21.54%	-9.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.89%	26.09%	-8.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.33%	27.84%	-5.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.00%	28.57%	-3.57%

XSVM vs. SPHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSVM has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSVM vs. SPHB - Dividend Comparison

XSVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than SPHB's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF	0.58%	0.60%	0.80%	0.73%	0.72%	0.91%	1.90%	1.26%	1.96%	1.34%	0.93%	1.69%
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF	1.75%	2.29%	1.69%	1.31%	1.79%	1.23%	1.21%	1.22%	2.54%	1.90%	2.29%	2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSVM and SPHB in my portfolio?

XSVM and SPHB have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XSVM or SPHB?

SPHB has higher volatility (9.30%) compared to XSVM (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVM dropped -62.57% vs SPHB's -46.84%.

Which ETF is better, XSVM or SPHB?

On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 17.94% vs 13.34% for XSVM. On fees, SPHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XSVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XSVM or SPHB?

Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 17.94% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSVM or SPHB?

SPHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for XSVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XSVM or SPHB?

XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.58% for SPHB.

What is the main difference between XSVM and SPHB?

XSVM is categorized as Momentum, while SPHB is S&P 500. XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index, while SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for XSVM and 0.25% for SPHB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.