JMOM vs. VAMO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and VAMO (Cambria Value and Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. JMOM is passively managed, while VAMO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMOM returned 15.02%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for VAMO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JMOM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for VAMO.

Performance

JMOM vs. VAMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMOM achieves a 21.80% return, which is significantly higher than VAMO's 4.86% return.

JMOM

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 2.98%
• YTD: 21.80%
• 6M: 19.67%
• 1Y: 32.36%
• 3Y*: 27.42%
• 5Y*: 15.02%
• 10Y*: —

VAMO

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 4.86%
• 6M: 3.48%
• 1Y: 19.83%
• 3Y*: 14.12%
• 5Y*: 8.99%
• 10Y*: 5.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMOM vs. VAMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	21.80%	18.02%	28.47%	22.89%	-20.83%	25.03%	29.25%	28.24%	-5.25%	3.36%
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	4.86%	16.51%	6.11%	5.58%	8.55%	32.16%	-4.92%	-4.63%	-11.43%	1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between JMOM and VAMO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017	0.45

The correlation between JMOM and VAMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JMOM vs. VAMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMOM

JMOM Risk / Return Rank: 78
JMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
JMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
JMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 70
JMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
JMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

VAMO

VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 64
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 56
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMOM vs. VAMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JMOM	VAMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	1.78	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	2.60	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.31	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.13	3.59	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.51	10.30	+8.21

JMOM vs. VAMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the VAMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMOM and VAMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JMOM vs. VAMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum VAMO drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and VAMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMOM	VAMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.31%	-41.84%	+7.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.87%	-5.55%	-2.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.51%	-11.61%	-7.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.26%	-17.25%	-11.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-1.15%	-1.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-9.93%	+3.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	1.93%	-0.18%

Volatility

JMOM vs. VAMO - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) at 2.71%. This indicates that JMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMOM	VAMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.17%	2.71%	+4.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.04%	7.63%	+5.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.64%	11.20%	+4.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.86%	17.18%	+1.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.19%	18.10%	+2.09%

JMOM vs. VAMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than VAMO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

JMOM vs. VAMO - Dividend Comparison

JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than VAMO's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	0.74%	0.86%	0.75%	1.21%	1.39%	0.64%	0.85%	1.11%	1.38%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	0.62%	1.41%	0.84%	1.35%	1.10%	1.07%	1.03%	1.15%	1.03%	0.35%	0.56%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMOM and VAMO in my portfolio?

JMOM and VAMO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JMOM or VAMO?

JMOM has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to VAMO (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMOM dropped -34.31% vs VAMO's -41.84%.

Which ETF is better, JMOM or VAMO?

On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 15.02% vs 8.99% for VAMO. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VAMO has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JMOM or VAMO?

Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 15.02% return vs 8.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMOM or VAMO?

JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for VAMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMOM or VAMO?

JMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.62% for VAMO.

What is the main difference between JMOM and VAMO?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JMOM and 0.65% for VAMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.