JMOM vs. ULVM
JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - JMOM tracks the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index while ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMOM returned 16.28%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for ULVM. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JMOM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ULVM.
Performance
JMOM vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMOM achieves a 22.79% return, which is significantly higher than ULVM's 14.84% return.
JMOM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 22.79%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 36.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- —
ULVM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 14.84%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- —
JMOM vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 22.79% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.32% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.84% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | -9.04% | 31.06% | 3.51% | 22.08% | -12.07% | 3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMOM and ULVM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.80 |
The correlation between JMOM and ULVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
JMOM vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JMOM
ULVM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
JMOM
ULVM
Industrials
JMOM
ULVM
Financial Services
JMOM
ULVM
Healthcare
JMOM
ULVM
Communication Services
JMOM
ULVM
Consumer Cyclical
JMOM
ULVM
Consumer Defensive
JMOM
ULVM
Energy
JMOM
ULVM
Real Estate
JMOM
ULVM
Utilities
JMOM
ULVM
Basic Materials
JMOM
ULVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMOM vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank
JMOM
ULVM
JMOM vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMOM | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.47 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 4.50 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.24 | 18.64 | +3.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMOM | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 2.71 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.74 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.58 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
JMOM vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum ULVM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and ULVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMOM | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -40.71% | +6.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | -6.47% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -18.14% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | -19.77% | -8.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.13% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -5.75% | -0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 1.56% | +0.10% |
Volatility
JMOM vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 2.96%. This indicates that JMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMOM | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 2.96% | +1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.55% | 7.97% | +3.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.32% | 10.74% | +3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 15.48% | +3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 18.86% | +1.27% |
JMOM vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JMOM vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison
JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than ULVM's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.71% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMOM and ULVM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMOM has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to ULVM (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMOM dropped -34.31% vs ULVM's -40.71%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.28% vs 11.43% for ULVM. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 11.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ULVM.
ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.71% for JMOM.
JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JMOM and 0.20% for ULVM.
ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMOM and ULVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer