JMOM vs. SMOM
JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. JMOM is passively managed, while SMOM is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JMOM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
JMOM vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMOM achieves a 22.79% return, which is significantly higher than SMOM's 9.82% return.
JMOM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 22.79%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 36.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- —
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMOM vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 22.79% | 1.91% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.82% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMOM and SMOM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMOM vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
JMOM
SMOM
JMOM vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMOM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.24 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMOM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.45 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
JMOM vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMOM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -7.45% | -26.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -1.48% | -4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | — | — |
Volatility
JMOM vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMOM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.32% | 12.62% | +1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 12.62% | +6.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 12.62% | +7.51% |
JMOM vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMOM vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.71% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMOM and SMOM have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
JMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
JMOM is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JMOM and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for JMOM and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer