SMOM vs. SPMO
SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. SMOM is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMOM charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
SMOM vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMOM achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 36.08% return.
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 8.28%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 11.71%
- YTD
- 36.08%
- 6M
- 35.05%
- 1Y
- 52.78%
- 3Y*
- 44.69%
- 5Y*
- 24.25%
- 10Y*
- 21.59%
SMOM vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 8.28% | 2.78% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 36.08% | 1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMOM and SPMO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMOM vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
SMOM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPMO
SMOM vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMOM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.78 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMOM vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOM drawdown since its inception was -7.45%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOM and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMOM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -30.95% | +23.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | 0.00% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -4.59% | +3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.35% | — |
Volatility
SMOM vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMOM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.76% | 20.05% | -7.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 19.77% | -7.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 20.55% | -7.79% |
SMOM vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMOM vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
SMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than SPMO's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMOM and SPMO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
SMOM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Symmetry Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for SMOM and 0.13% for SPMO.
Find the right allocation for SMOM and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer