SMOM vs. JOET

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) and JOET (Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners, while JOET is a Quality Factor fund tracking the Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index. SMOM is actively managed, while JOET is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SMOM charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for JOET.

Performance

SMOM vs. JOET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM) and Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMOM achieves a 9.28% return, which is significantly higher than JOET's 8.43% return.

SMOM

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 1.78%
• 6M: 7.98%
• YTD: 9.28%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

JOET

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -0.44%
• 6M: 7.91%
• YTD: 8.43%
• 1Y: 13.51%
• 3Y*: 16.45%
• 5Y*: 9.44%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF	$871.40K	$1.08M	$923.13K
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF	$282.40K	$230.96K	$175.69K

SMOM vs. JOET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF	9.28%	2.78%
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF	8.43%	0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SMOM and JOET is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025	0.83

Return for Risk

SMOM vs. JOET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMOM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JOET

JOET Risk / Return Rank: 34
JOET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
JOET Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
JOET Omega Ratio Rank: 31
JOET Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
JOET Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMOM vs. JOET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM) and Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMOM	JOET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.82	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.25	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.15	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.11	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.20	—

Drawdowns

SMOM vs. JOET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMOM drawdown since its inception was -7.45%, smaller than the maximum JOET drawdown of -26.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOM and JOET.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMOM	JOET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.45%	-26.58%	+19.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.42%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-1.61%	+1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.49%	-7.02%	+5.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.75%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMOM	JOET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.42%	14.06%	-1.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.42%	17.79%	-5.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.42%	17.45%	-5.03%

SMOM vs. JOET - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMOM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than JOET's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMOM vs. JOET - Dividend Comparison

SMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than JOET's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF	0.60%	0.65%	0.71%	1.32%	1.25%	0.42%	0.08%
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF	0.15%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMOM and JOET in my portfolio?

SMOM and JOET have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMOM or JOET?

On fees, JOET is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMOM or JOET?

JOET is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMOM or JOET?

JOET has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.

What is the main difference between SMOM and JOET?

SMOM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while JOET is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: Symmetry Partners and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for SMOM and 0.29% for JOET.