SMOM vs. QMOM

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) and QMOM (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners, while QMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMOM charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QMOM.

Performance

SMOM vs. QMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMOM achieves a 6.85% return, which is significantly lower than QMOM's 18.66% return.

SMOM

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.64%
• YTD: 6.85%
• 6M: 5.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMOM

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 18.66%
• 6M: 16.00%
• 1Y: 22.36%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: 9.92%
• 10Y*: 13.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMOM vs. QMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF	6.85%	2.78%
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	18.66%	3.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SMOM and QMOM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025	0.78

Return for Risk

SMOM vs. QMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMOM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QMOM

QMOM Risk / Return Rank: 32
QMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
QMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
QMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 27
QMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
QMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMOM vs. QMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMOM	QMOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.91	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.36	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.17	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.78	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.21	—

Drawdowns

SMOM vs. QMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMOM drawdown since its inception was -7.45%, smaller than the maximum QMOM drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOM and QMOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMOM	QMOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.45%	-39.13%	+31.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.65%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.46%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.82%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-5.15%	+2.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.50%	-12.88%	+11.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.61%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMOM	QMOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.60%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.77%	24.69%	-11.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.77%	24.42%	-11.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.77%	26.62%	-13.85%

SMOM vs. QMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMOM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than QMOM's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMOM vs. QMOM - Dividend Comparison

SMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than QMOM's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	0.46%	0.54%	1.40%	0.87%	1.59%	0.12%	0.08%	0.01%	0.05%	0.13%	0.34%
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF	0.15%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMOM and QMOM in my portfolio?

SMOM and QMOM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMOM or QMOM?

On fees, QMOM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMOM or QMOM?

QMOM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMOM or QMOM?

QMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.

What is the main difference between SMOM and QMOM?

SMOM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QMOM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Symmetry Partners and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for SMOM and 0.28% for QMOM.