JMOM vs. PTH
JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - JMOM tracks the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index while PTH tracks the Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMOM returned 15.11%/yr vs 2.58%/yr for PTH. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JMOM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTH.
Performance
JMOM vs. PTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMOM achieves a 22.69% return, which is significantly higher than PTH's 19.31% return.
JMOM
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 18.60%
- YTD
- 22.69%
- 1Y
- 30.73%
- 3Y*
- 25.96%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- —
PTH
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 21.15%
- YTD
- 19.31%
- 1Y
- 58.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.80%
JMOM vs. PTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 22.69% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.36% |
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 19.31% | 27.91% | 2.36% | -4.54% | -20.61% | -3.20% | 67.26% | 34.45% | -1.23% | 4.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMOM and PTH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.65 |
The correlation between JMOM and PTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JMOM vs. PTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JMOM
PTH
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
JMOM
PTH
-
Industrials
JMOM
PTH
-
Financial Services
JMOM
PTH
Healthcare
JMOM
PTH
Communication Services
JMOM
PTH
-
Consumer Cyclical
JMOM
PTH
-
Consumer Defensive
JMOM
PTH
-
Energy
JMOM
PTH
-
Real Estate
JMOM
PTH
-
Utilities
JMOM
PTH
-
Basic Materials
JMOM
PTH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMOM vs. PTH — Risk / Return Rank
JMOM
PTH
JMOM vs. PTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JMOM | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 4.89 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.02 | 12.39 | +4.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JMOM vs. PTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum PTH drawdown of -53.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and PTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMOM | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -53.52% | +19.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | -11.98% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -27.74% | +8.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | -50.07% | +21.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -3.84% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.26% | -16.95% | +10.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 4.73% | -2.92% |
Volatility
JMOM vs. PTH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) is 6.06%, while Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that JMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMOM | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 6.65% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.50% | 19.20% | -5.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.99% | 24.30% | -8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.93% | 25.65% | -6.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 27.32% | -7.14% |
JMOM vs. PTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than PTH's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMOM vs. PTH - Dividend Comparison
JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than PTH's 2.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.73% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% |
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 2.57% | 3.07% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMOM and PTH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTH has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to JMOM (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMOM dropped -34.31% vs PTH's -53.52%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 15.11% vs 2.58% for PTH. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JMOM has been the lower-risk option at 6.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 15.11% return vs 2.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTH.
PTH has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.73% for JMOM.
JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while PTH tracks Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JMOM and 0.60% for PTH.
PTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMOM and PTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer