PTH vs. PJP
PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) and PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTH is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index, while PJP is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTH returned 14.65%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for PJP. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTH charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PJP.
Performance
PTH vs. PJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTH achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly higher than PJP's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, PTH has outperformed PJP with an annualized return of 14.65%, while PJP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.44% annualized return.
PTH
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 47.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.29%
- 5Y*
- 0.29%
- 10Y*
- 14.65%
PJP
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 4.87%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- 44.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
PTH vs. PJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 10.66% | 27.91% | 2.36% | -4.54% | -20.61% | -3.20% | 67.26% | 34.45% | -1.23% | 50.15% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 9.74% | 27.98% | 9.63% | -2.18% | -2.16% | 14.58% | 11.29% | 4.64% | -1.78% | 15.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTH and PJP is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.74 |
The correlation between PTH and PJP shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PTH vs. PJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTH
PJP
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PTH
PJP
Financial Services
PTH
PJP
Basic Materials
PTH
-
PJP
-
Communication Services
PTH
-
PJP
-
Consumer Cyclical
PTH
-
PJP
-
Consumer Defensive
PTH
-
PJP
-
Energy
PTH
-
PJP
-
Industrials
PTH
-
PJP
-
Real Estate
PTH
-
PJP
-
Technology
PTH
-
PJP
-
Utilities
PTH
-
PJP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTH vs. PJP — Risk / Return Rank
PTH
PJP
PTH vs. PJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTH | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.45 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 4.75 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.05 | 15.06 | -5.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTH vs. PJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTH drawdown since its inception was -53.52%, which is greater than PJP's maximum drawdown of -37.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTH and PJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTH | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.52% | -37.06% | -16.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.98% | -9.44% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.09% | -16.27% | -11.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.07% | -17.51% | -32.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.52% | -33.95% | -19.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.70% | 0.00% | -9.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.99% | -8.83% | -8.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 2.97% | +1.82% |
Volatility
PTH vs. PJP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) at 5.39%. This indicates that PTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTH | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.29% | 5.39% | +3.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.85% | 12.46% | +6.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.06% | 16.58% | +7.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.57% | 16.20% | +9.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.30% | 18.37% | +8.93% |
PTH vs. PJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PJP's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTH vs. PJP - Dividend Comparison
PTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than PJP's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.93% | 0.98% | 0.97% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 5.49% |
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 2.78% | 3.07% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTH and PJP have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTH has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to PJP (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTH dropped -53.52% vs PJP's -37.06%.
On 10-year performance, PTH leads with 14.65% vs 7.44% for PJP. On fees, PJP is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PJP has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PTH has performed better with a 14.65% return vs 7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PJP is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTH.
PTH has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.93% for PJP.
PTH is categorized as Momentum, while PJP is Health & Biotech Equities. PTH tracks Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index, while PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTH and 0.58% for PJP.
PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTH and PJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer