PTH vs. PRN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) and PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PTH tracks the Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index while PRN tracks the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTH returned 14.65%/yr vs 19.03%/yr for PRN. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

PTH vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTH achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 45.08% return. Over the past 10 years, PTH has underperformed PRN with an annualized return of 14.65%, while PRN has yielded a comparatively higher 19.03% annualized return.

PTH

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 7.38%
• YTD: 10.66%
• 6M: 8.96%
• 1Y: 47.97%
• 3Y*: 12.29%
• 5Y*: 0.29%
• 10Y*: 14.65%

PRN

• 1D: -3.57%
• 1M: 6.97%
• YTD: 45.08%
• 6M: 39.29%
• 1Y: 65.87%
• 3Y*: 36.27%
• 5Y*: 20.84%
• 10Y*: 19.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTH vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF	10.66%	27.91%	2.36%	-4.54%	-20.61%	-3.20%	67.26%	34.45%	-1.23%	50.15%
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	45.08%	13.74%	30.35%	37.96%	-25.09%	25.21%	36.39%	34.52%	-16.19%	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PTH and PRN is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006	0.66

The correlation between PTH and PRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTH vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTH	PRN
Healthcare	99.8%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.8%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	1.6%
Industrials	-	78.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	20.4%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PTH vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTH

PTH Risk / Return Rank: 66
PTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
PTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
PTH Omega Ratio Rank: 58
PTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
PTH Martin Ratio Rank: 61

PRN

PRN Risk / Return Rank: 72
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTH vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTH	PRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	2.18	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	2.72	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.35	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	4.68	-0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.05	15.34	-5.29

PTH vs. PRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTH Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the PRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTH and PRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTH vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTH drawdown since its inception was -53.52%, smaller than the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTH and PRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTH	PRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.52%	-59.88%	+6.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.98%	-14.15%	+2.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.09%	-30.78%	+2.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.07%	-34.84%	-15.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.52%	-36.27%	-17.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.70%	-3.57%	-6.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.99%	-10.82%	-6.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	4.31%	+0.48%

Volatility

PTH vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) is 9.29%, while Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a volatility of 12.02%. This indicates that PTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTH	PRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.29%	12.02%	-2.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.85%	24.35%	-5.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.06%	30.47%	-6.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.57%	25.41%	+0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.30%	24.38%	+2.92%

PTH vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PTH and PRN have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

PTH vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

PTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than PRN's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	0.08%	0.17%	0.39%	0.52%	0.82%	0.11%	0.10%	0.42%	0.29%	0.60%	0.57%	0.44%
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF	2.78%	3.07%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTH and PRN in my portfolio?

PTH and PRN have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTH or PRN?

PRN has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to PTH (9.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTH dropped -53.52% vs PRN's -59.88%.

Which ETF is better, PTH or PRN?

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 19.03% vs 14.65% for PTH. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PTH has been the lower-risk option at 9.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTH or PRN?

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 14.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTH or PRN?

PTH and PRN have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTH or PRN?

PTH has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.08% for PRN.

What is the main difference between PTH and PRN?

PTH tracks Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index, while PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.