PTH vs. XLV
PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTH is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTH returned 14.65%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for XLV. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTH charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
PTH vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTH achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PTH has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 14.65%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return.
PTH
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 47.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.29%
- 5Y*
- 0.29%
- 10Y*
- 14.65%
XLV
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 6M
- -0.97%
- 1Y
- 17.16%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.69%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
PTH vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 10.66% | 27.91% | 2.36% | -4.54% | -20.61% | -3.20% | 67.26% | 34.45% | -1.23% | 50.15% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.85% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTH and XLV is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PTH and XLV has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PTH vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTH
XLV
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PTH
XLV
Financial Services
PTH
XLV
-
Basic Materials
PTH
-
XLV
-
Communication Services
PTH
-
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
PTH
-
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
PTH
-
XLV
-
Energy
PTH
-
XLV
-
Industrials
PTH
-
XLV
-
Real Estate
PTH
-
XLV
-
Technology
PTH
-
XLV
-
Utilities
PTH
-
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTH vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
PTH
XLV
PTH vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTH | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.20 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 1.65 | +2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.05 | 3.89 | +6.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTH vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTH drawdown since its inception was -53.52%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTH and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTH | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.52% | -39.17% | -14.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.98% | -10.47% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.09% | -17.11% | -10.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.07% | -17.11% | -32.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.52% | -28.40% | -25.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.70% | -4.20% | -5.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.99% | -7.12% | -9.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 4.42% | +0.37% |
Volatility
PTH vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 5.27%. This indicates that PTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTH | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.29% | 5.27% | +4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.85% | 10.68% | +8.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.06% | 15.09% | +8.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.57% | 14.77% | +10.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.30% | 16.57% | +10.73% |
PTH vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTH vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
PTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than XLV's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 2.78% | 3.07% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.66% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTH and XLV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTH has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to XLV (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTH dropped -53.52% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, PTH leads with 14.65% vs 10.01% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PTH has performed better with a 14.65% return vs 10.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTH.
PTH has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.66% for XLV.
PTH is categorized as Momentum, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. PTH tracks Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTH and 0.08% for XLV.
PTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTH and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer