JHSC vs. JHMM
JHSC (John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF) and JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHSC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index, while JHMM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHSC returned 7.04%/yr vs 8.39%/yr for JHMM. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.42% expense ratio.
Performance
JHSC vs. JHMM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHSC achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than JHMM's 12.60% return.
JHSC
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 24.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- —
JHMM
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 24.83%
- 3Y*
- 17.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
JHSC vs. JHMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 11.55% | 6.88% | 9.74% | 20.77% | -14.65% | 19.55% | 11.60% | 24.43% | -12.50% | 4.48% |
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 12.60% | 10.73% | 14.61% | 14.53% | -15.30% | 24.54% | 16.22% | 30.01% | -9.57% | 4.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHSC and JHMM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.95 |
The correlation between JHSC and JHMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHSC vs. JHMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHSC
JHMM
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
JHSC
JHMM
Industrials
JHSC
JHMM
Technology
JHSC
JHMM
Consumer Cyclical
JHSC
JHMM
Energy
JHSC
JHMM
Healthcare
JHSC
JHMM
Real Estate
JHSC
JHMM
Basic Materials
JHSC
JHMM
Utilities
JHSC
JHMM
Consumer Defensive
JHSC
JHMM
Communication Services
JHSC
JHMM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHSC vs. JHMM — Risk / Return Rank
JHSC
JHMM
JHSC vs. JHMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHSC | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.31 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 2.89 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.69 | 11.17 | -2.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHSC | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.77 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.46 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.63 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
JHSC vs. JHMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHSC drawdown since its inception was -42.66%, roughly equal to the maximum JHMM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHSC and JHMM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHSC | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.66% | -40.71% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -8.64% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | -21.88% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.21% | -24.10% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.24% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -5.43% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 2.23% | +0.55% |
Volatility
JHSC vs. JHMM - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) at 3.81%. This indicates that JHSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHSC | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 3.81% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 10.47% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 14.12% | +2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 18.32% | +1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.21% | 19.60% | +2.61% |
JHSC vs. JHMM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JHSC and JHMM have an expense ratio of 0.42%.
Dividends
JHSC vs. JHMM - Dividend Comparison
JHSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than JHMM's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 0.87% | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% |
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.13% | 0.96% | 0.98% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, JHSC and JHMM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JHSC has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to JHMM (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHSC dropped -42.66% vs JHMM's -40.71%.
On 5-year performance, JHMM leads with 8.39% vs 7.04% for JHSC. Both ETFs have the same 0.42% expense ratio. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 8.39% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHSC and JHMM have the same expense ratio: 0.42% per year.
JHSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.87% for JHMM.
JHSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while JHMM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. JHSC tracks John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index, while JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index.
JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHSC and JHMM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer