PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHSC vs. JHMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHSC vs. JHMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHSC achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than JHMM's 12.60% return.


JHSC

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.04%
YTD
11.55%
6M
10.59%
1Y
24.10%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*

JHMM

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.21%
YTD
12.60%
6M
13.14%
1Y
24.83%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
11.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHSC vs. JHMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
11.55%6.88%9.74%20.77%-14.65%19.55%11.60%24.43%-12.50%4.48%
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
12.60%10.73%14.61%14.53%-15.30%24.54%16.22%30.01%-9.57%4.25%

Correlation

The correlation between JHSC and JHMM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.95

The correlation between JHSC and JHMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHSC vs. JHMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHSC
JHMM

Financial Services

18.3%
15.3%

Industrials

16.8%
19.4%

Technology

14.1%
17.2%

Consumer Cyclical

14.1%
11.0%

Energy

7.5%
5.4%

Healthcare

7.4%
10.2%

Real Estate

6.0%
5.4%

Basic Materials

5.1%
4.2%

Utilities

4.2%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
3.7%

Communication Services

3.0%
2.7%

Financial Services

JHSC
18.3%
JHMM
15.3%

Industrials

JHSC
16.8%
JHMM
19.4%

Technology

JHSC
14.1%
JHMM
17.2%

Consumer Cyclical

JHSC
14.1%
JHMM
11.0%

Energy

JHSC
7.5%
JHMM
5.4%

Healthcare

JHSC
7.4%
JHMM
10.2%

Real Estate

JHSC
6.0%
JHMM
5.4%

Basic Materials

JHSC
5.1%
JHMM
4.2%

Utilities

JHSC
4.2%
JHMM
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

JHSC
3.4%
JHMM
3.7%

Communication Services

JHSC
3.0%
JHMM
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHSC vs. JHMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHSC
JHSC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
JHSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
JHSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

JHMM
JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHSC vs. JHMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHSCJHMMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.89

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.69

11.17

-2.47

JHSC vs. JHMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the JHMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHSC and JHMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHSCJHMMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.77

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.46

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.63

-0.23

Drawdowns

JHSC vs. JHMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHSC drawdown since its inception was -42.66%, roughly equal to the maximum JHMM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHSC and JHMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHSCJHMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.66%

-40.71%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-8.64%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-21.88%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.21%

-24.10%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.24%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-5.43%

-2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.23%

+0.55%

Volatility

JHSC vs. JHMM - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) at 3.81%. This indicates that JHSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHSCJHMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.81%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.11%

10.47%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

14.12%

+2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.15%

18.32%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.21%

19.60%

+2.61%

JHSC vs. JHMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JHSC and JHMM have an expense ratio of 0.42%.


Dividends

JHSC vs. JHMM - Dividend Comparison

JHSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than JHMM's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
0.87%0.98%1.01%1.17%1.16%0.72%1.04%1.02%1.36%0.90%1.15%0.33%
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.01%1.13%0.96%0.98%1.13%1.08%1.12%1.14%1.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JHSC and JHMM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JHSC has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to JHMM (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHSC dropped -42.66% vs JHMM's -40.71%.

On 5-year performance, JHMM leads with 8.39% vs 7.04% for JHSC. Both ETFs have the same 0.42% expense ratio. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 8.39% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHSC and JHMM have the same expense ratio: 0.42% per year.

JHSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.87% for JHMM.

JHSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while JHMM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. JHSC tracks John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index, while JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index.

JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHSC and JHMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer