JHMM vs. SCHM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) and SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - JHMM tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index while SCHM tracks the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JHMM returned 11.91%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for SCHM. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JHMM charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHM.

Performance

JHMM vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly lower than SCHM's 19.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JHMM having a 11.91% annualized return and SCHM not far behind at 11.37%.

JHMM

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 2.92%
• YTD: 12.87%
• 6M: 14.13%
• 1Y: 26.43%
• 3Y*: 17.11%
• 5Y*: 8.57%
• 10Y*: 11.91%

SCHM

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 4.90%
• YTD: 19.08%
• 6M: 20.61%
• 1Y: 34.01%
• 3Y*: 18.15%
• 5Y*: 8.23%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMM vs. SCHM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF	12.87%	10.73%	14.61%	14.53%	-15.30%	24.54%	16.22%	30.01%	-9.57%	19.96%
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF	19.08%	10.17%	11.98%	16.69%	-17.07%	19.36%	15.26%	27.48%	-8.77%	19.60%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMM and SCHM is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015	0.97

The correlation between JHMM and SCHM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHMM vs. SCHM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JHMM	SCHM
Industrials	19.4%	21.4%
Technology	17.2%	22.0%
Financial Services	15.3%	11.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	10.3%
Healthcare	10.2%	10.8%
Utilities	5.4%	3.0%
Energy	5.4%	3.6%
Real Estate	5.4%	6.5%
Basic Materials	4.2%	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	3.8%
Communication Services	2.7%	2.6%

Return for Risk

JHMM vs. SCHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMM

JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 57
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 52
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 64

SCHM

SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 68
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMM vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JHMM	SCHM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.19	-0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	3.06	-0.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.38	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	3.65	-0.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.85	14.75	-2.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JHMM vs. SCHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the SCHM Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMM and SCHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHMM	SCHM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	2.19	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.42	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.56	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.59	+0.04

Drawdowns

JHMM vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHM drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and SCHM.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHMM	SCHM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.71%	-42.43%	+1.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.64%	-9.32%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.88%	-23.27%	+1.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.10%	-26.46%	+2.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.71%	-42.43%	+1.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.44%	-5.66%	+0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	2.31%	-0.08%

Volatility

JHMM vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is 3.85%, while Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that JHMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHMM	SCHM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	4.75%	-0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.49%	11.77%	-1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.11%	15.62%	-1.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.32%	19.56%	-1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.60%	20.47%	-0.87%

JHMM vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHM's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHMM vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison

JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than SCHM's 1.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF	0.87%	0.98%	1.01%	1.17%	1.16%	0.72%	1.04%	1.02%	1.36%	0.90%	1.15%	0.33%
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF	1.22%	1.46%	1.43%	1.50%	1.67%	1.13%	1.31%	1.48%	1.56%	1.27%	1.51%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHMM and SCHM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, JHMM and SCHM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JHMM or SCHM?

SCHM has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to JHMM (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMM dropped -40.71% vs SCHM's -42.43%.

Which ETF is better, JHMM or SCHM?

On 10-year performance, JHMM leads with 11.91% vs 11.37% for SCHM. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JHMM or SCHM?

Over the 10-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHMM or SCHM?

SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHMM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHMM or SCHM?

SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.87% for JHMM.

What is the main difference between JHMM and SCHM?

JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHMM and 0.04% for SCHM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.