JHMM vs. JHSC
JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) and JHSC (John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHMM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while JHSC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHMM returned 8.57%/yr vs 7.29%/yr for JHSC. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.42% expense ratio.
Performance
JHMM vs. JHSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JHMM having a 12.87% return and JHSC slightly lower at 12.41%.
JHMM
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 6M
- 14.13%
- 1Y
- 26.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
JHSC
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 12.41%
- 6M
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- 27.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.29%
- 10Y*
- —
JHMM vs. JHSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 12.87% | 10.73% | 14.61% | 14.53% | -15.30% | 24.54% | 16.22% | 30.01% | -9.57% | 4.25% |
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 12.41% | 6.88% | 9.74% | 20.77% | -14.65% | 19.55% | 11.60% | 24.43% | -12.50% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMM and JHSC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.95 |
The correlation between JHMM and JHSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHMM vs. JHSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHMM
JHSC
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
JHMM
JHSC
Technology
JHMM
JHSC
Financial Services
JHMM
JHSC
Consumer Cyclical
JHMM
JHSC
Healthcare
JHMM
JHSC
Utilities
JHMM
JHSC
Energy
JHMM
JHSC
Real Estate
JHMM
JHSC
Basic Materials
JHMM
JHSC
Consumer Defensive
JHMM
JHSC
Communication Services
JHMM
JHSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHMM vs. JHSC — Risk / Return Rank
JHMM
JHSC
JHMM vs. JHSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHMM | JHSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 1.67 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | 2.45 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.29 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 2.77 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.85 | 9.60 | +2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHMM | JHSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.67 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.36 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.40 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
JHMM vs. JHSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, roughly equal to the maximum JHSC drawdown of -42.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and JHSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMM | JHSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -42.66% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -9.63% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.88% | -25.16% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.10% | -25.21% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.04% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -7.78% | +2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 2.78% | -0.55% |
Volatility
JHMM vs. JHSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is 3.85%, while John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that JHMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHMM | JHSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 4.17% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.49% | 11.09% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.11% | 16.25% | -2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 20.15% | -1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.60% | 22.21% | -2.61% |
JHMM vs. JHSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JHMM and JHSC have an expense ratio of 0.42%.
Dividends
JHMM vs. JHSC - Dividend Comparison
JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than JHSC's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 0.87% | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% |
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.13% | 0.96% | 0.98% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, JHMM and JHSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JHSC has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to JHMM (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMM dropped -40.71% vs JHSC's -42.66%.
On 5-year performance, JHMM leads with 8.57% vs 7.29% for JHSC. Both ETFs have the same 0.42% expense ratio. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 8.57% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHMM and JHSC have the same expense ratio: 0.42% per year.
JHSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.87% for JHMM.
JHMM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while JHSC is Small Cap Growth Equities. JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while JHSC tracks John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index.
JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHMM and JHSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer