PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMM vs. JHSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMM vs. JHSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JHMM having a 12.87% return and JHSC slightly lower at 12.41%.


JHMM

1D
1.01%
1M
2.92%
YTD
12.87%
6M
14.13%
1Y
26.43%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
11.91%

JHSC

1D
0.64%
1M
2.00%
YTD
12.41%
6M
12.95%
1Y
27.02%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMM vs. JHSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
12.87%10.73%14.61%14.53%-15.30%24.54%16.22%30.01%-9.57%4.25%
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
12.41%6.88%9.74%20.77%-14.65%19.55%11.60%24.43%-12.50%4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMM and JHSC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.95

The correlation between JHMM and JHSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHMM vs. JHSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHMM
JHSC

Industrials

19.4%
16.8%

Technology

17.2%
14.1%

Financial Services

15.3%
18.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
14.1%

Healthcare

10.2%
7.4%

Utilities

5.4%
4.2%

Energy

5.4%
7.5%

Real Estate

5.4%
6.0%

Basic Materials

4.2%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.4%

Communication Services

2.7%
3.0%

Industrials

JHMM
19.4%
JHSC
16.8%

Technology

JHMM
17.2%
JHSC
14.1%

Financial Services

JHMM
15.3%
JHSC
18.3%

Consumer Cyclical

JHMM
11.0%
JHSC
14.1%

Healthcare

JHMM
10.2%
JHSC
7.4%

Utilities

JHMM
5.4%
JHSC
4.2%

Energy

JHMM
5.4%
JHSC
7.5%

Real Estate

JHMM
5.4%
JHSC
6.0%

Basic Materials

JHMM
4.2%
JHSC
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

JHMM
3.7%
JHSC
3.4%

Communication Services

JHMM
2.7%
JHSC
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMM vs. JHSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMM
JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

JHSC
JHSC Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
JHSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
JHSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMM vs. JHSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHMMJHSCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

1.67

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

2.45

+0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.77

+0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.85

9.60

+2.24

JHMM vs. JHSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the JHSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMM and JHSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHMMJHSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.67

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.36

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.40

+0.23

Drawdowns

JHMM vs. JHSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, roughly equal to the maximum JHSC drawdown of -42.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and JHSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMMJHSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-42.66%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-9.63%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.88%

-25.16%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

-25.21%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.04%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-7.78%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

2.78%

-0.55%

Volatility

JHMM vs. JHSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is 3.85%, while John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that JHMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMMJHSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

4.17%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

11.09%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.11%

16.25%

-2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.32%

20.15%

-1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.60%

22.21%

-2.61%

JHMM vs. JHSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JHMM and JHSC have an expense ratio of 0.42%.


Dividends

JHMM vs. JHSC - Dividend Comparison

JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than JHSC's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
0.87%0.98%1.01%1.17%1.16%0.72%1.04%1.02%1.36%0.90%1.15%0.33%
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.00%1.13%0.96%0.98%1.13%1.08%1.12%1.14%1.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, JHMM and JHSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JHSC has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to JHMM (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMM dropped -40.71% vs JHSC's -42.66%.

On 5-year performance, JHMM leads with 8.57% vs 7.29% for JHSC. Both ETFs have the same 0.42% expense ratio. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 8.57% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHMM and JHSC have the same expense ratio: 0.42% per year.

JHSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.87% for JHMM.

JHMM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while JHSC is Small Cap Growth Equities. JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while JHSC tracks John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index.

JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMM and JHSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer