PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMD vs. BKIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMD vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMD achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than BKIE's 8.46% return.


JHMD

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.80%
YTD
7.87%
6M
10.87%
1Y
21.60%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*

BKIE

1D
-0.89%
1M
3.12%
YTD
8.46%
6M
11.11%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMD vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JHMD
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
7.87%33.91%1.78%19.43%-13.95%11.83%35.73%
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
8.46%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%13.75%34.17%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMD and BKIE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020

0.97

The correlation between JHMD and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHMD vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHMD
BKIE

Financial Services

24.8%
25.8%

Industrials

19.9%
18.6%

Healthcare

8.9%
9.1%

Basic Materials

7.8%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
6.2%

Technology

7.0%
10.1%

Utilities

5.7%
3.7%

Communication Services

5.3%
4.2%

Energy

4.0%
5.9%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.0%

Financial Services

JHMD
24.8%
BKIE
25.8%

Industrials

JHMD
19.9%
BKIE
18.6%

Healthcare

JHMD
8.9%
BKIE
9.1%

Basic Materials

JHMD
7.8%
BKIE
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

JHMD
7.6%
BKIE
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

JHMD
7.4%
BKIE
6.2%

Technology

JHMD
7.0%
BKIE
10.1%

Utilities

JHMD
5.7%
BKIE
3.7%

Communication Services

JHMD
5.3%
BKIE
4.2%

Energy

JHMD
4.0%
BKIE
5.9%

Real Estate

JHMD
1.6%
BKIE
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMD vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMD
JHMD Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
JHMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMD vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHMDBKIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.99

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.21

7.68

-0.47

JHMD vs. BKIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the BKIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMD and BKIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHMDBKIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.56

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.56

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.92

-0.37

Drawdowns

JHMD vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMD drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMD and BKIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMDBKIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.67%

-28.19%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.23%

-11.41%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.38%

-13.19%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.38%

-28.19%

-1.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-1.33%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-4.98%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.95%

+0.05%

Volatility

JHMD vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) at 4.42%. This indicates that JHMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMDBKIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

4.42%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

12.17%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

14.58%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

16.12%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

16.34%

+0.86%

JHMD vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHMD vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

JHMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than BKIE's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.26%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JHMD
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
2.96%3.19%3.55%3.01%2.85%3.22%1.89%3.19%2.09%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, JHMD and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JHMD has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to BKIE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMD dropped -35.67% vs BKIE's -28.19%.

On 5-year performance, BKIE leads with 9.05% vs 8.47% for JHMD. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 9.05% return vs 8.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JHMD.

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.96% for JHMD.

JHMD tracks John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMD and 0.04% for BKIE.

BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMD and BKIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer