PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKIE vs. BKEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKIE vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKIE achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly lower than BKEM's 19.49% return.


BKIE

1D
-0.70%
1M
1.29%
6M
6.90%
YTD
11.71%
1Y
26.09%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.05%

BKEM

1D
1.00%
1M
-2.28%
6M
10.09%
YTD
19.49%
1Y
36.07%
3Y*
18.26%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$479.81K$325.26K$242.87K
$7.08M$6.86M$6.10M

BKIE vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
11.71%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%13.75%34.17%
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
19.49%30.55%7.53%8.68%-19.43%-3.91%48.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BKIE and BKEM is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.74

The correlation between BKIE and BKEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKIE vs. BKEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKIE
BKEM

Financial Services

26.6%
17.5%

Industrials

17.9%
7.6%

Technology

11.7%
44.5%

Healthcare

9.1%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
7.7%

Basic Materials

6.7%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
2.6%

Energy

5.0%
3.1%

Communication Services

4.1%
5.8%

Utilities

3.5%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.1%

Financial Services

BKIE
26.6%
BKEM
17.5%

Industrials

BKIE
17.9%
BKEM
7.6%

Technology

BKIE
11.7%
BKEM
44.5%

Healthcare

BKIE
9.1%
BKEM
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BKIE
7.2%
BKEM
7.7%

Basic Materials

BKIE
6.7%
BKEM
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

BKIE
6.3%
BKEM
2.6%

Energy

BKIE
5.0%
BKEM
3.1%

Communication Services

BKIE
4.1%
BKEM
5.8%

Utilities

BKIE
3.5%
BKEM
2.0%

Real Estate

BKIE
1.8%
BKEM
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKIE vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

BKEM
BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKIE vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKIEBKEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.54

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.73

7.83

+0.90

BKIE vs. BKEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the BKEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKIE and BKEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKIE vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKIE drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, smaller than the maximum BKEM drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKIE and BKEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKIEBKEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.19%

-39.48%

+11.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-13.91%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.19%

-18.38%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.19%

-33.28%

+5.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-9.52%

+8.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-15.76%

+10.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

4.49%

-1.56%

Volatility

BKIE vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) is 4.29%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that BKIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKIEBKEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

9.22%

-4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

21.85%

-8.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.27%

23.85%

-8.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

19.61%

-3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.32%

19.76%

-3.44%

BKIE vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKIE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKIE vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison

BKIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than BKEM's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.96%2.25%2.76%3.02%3.15%2.22%1.78%
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.15%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKIE and BKEM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKEM has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to BKIE (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKIE dropped -28.19% vs BKEM's -39.48%.

On 5-year performance, BKIE leads with 9.97% vs 7.27% for BKEM. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 9.97% return vs 7.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for BKEM.

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 1.96% for BKEM.

BKIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BKEM is Emerging Markets Equities. BKIE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR, while BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKIE and 0.11% for BKEM.

BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKIE and BKEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer