JHCB vs. UCO
JHCB (John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF) and UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - JHCB is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by John Hancock, while UCO is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). JHCB is actively managed, while UCO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHCB returned 0.64%/yr vs 22.16%/yr for UCO. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. JHCB charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UCO.
Performance
JHCB vs. UCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHCB achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 149.12% return.
JHCB
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 5.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.68%
- 5Y*
- 0.64%
- 10Y*
- —
UCO
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- YTD
- 149.12%
- 6M
- 137.09%
- 1Y
- 120.48%
- 3Y*
- 25.90%
- 5Y*
- 22.16%
- 10Y*
- -11.31%
JHCB vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHCB John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF | 0.37% | 8.02% | 2.75% | 8.89% | -15.93% | 3.41% |
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 149.12% | -29.75% | 5.36% | -13.89% | 39.71% | 64.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHCB and UCO is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021 | -0.11 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between JHCB and UCO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.11 to -0.43, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHCB vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank
JHCB
UCO
JHCB vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHCB | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 2.12 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 2.46 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.32 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 3.49 | -1.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | 6.60 | -0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHCB | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 2.12 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.37 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.34 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
JHCB vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHCB drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCB and UCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHCB | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.61% | -99.95% | +77.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.16% | -34.77% | +31.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.54% | -50.38% | +43.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.61% | -67.24% | +44.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -99.23% | +98.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -85.49% | +77.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 18.33% | -17.37% |
Volatility
JHCB vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) is 1.42%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 20.83%. This indicates that JHCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHCB | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 20.83% | -19.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.25% | 46.44% | -43.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.41% | 57.11% | -52.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.95% | 59.78% | -52.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.88% | 71.36% | -64.48% |
JHCB vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHCB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHCB vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison
JHCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHCB John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF | 4.96% | 4.92% | 5.02% | 4.35% | 3.86% | 2.41% |
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHCB and UCO have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCO has higher volatility (20.83%) compared to JHCB (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCB dropped -22.61% vs UCO's -99.95%.
On 5-year performance, UCO leads with 22.16% vs 0.64% for JHCB. On fees, JHCB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JHCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UCO has performed better with a 22.16% return vs 0.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHCB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCO.
JHCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.
JHCB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while UCO is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHCB and 0.95% for UCO.
UCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHCB and UCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer