JHCB vs. GABF
JHCB (John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHCB is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by John Hancock, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JHCB returned 5.65%/yr vs 20.10%/yr for GABF. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JHCB charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.
Performance
JHCB vs. GABF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JHCB
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- -0.00%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 5.65%
- 5Y*
- 0.21%
- 10Y*
- —
GABF
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- -5.40%
- YTD
- -2.34%
- 1Y
- -4.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHCB vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHCB John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF | -0.00% | 8.02% | 2.75% | 8.89% | -2.28% |
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | -2.34% | 3.60% | 44.38% | 38.92% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHCB and GABF is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHCB vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank
JHCB
GABF
JHCB vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHCB | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.98 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | -0.24 | +1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.43 | -0.53 | +3.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHCB vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHCB drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCB and GABF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHCB | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.61% | -20.86% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.16% | -17.16% | +14.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.54% | -20.86% | +14.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -7.14% | +5.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -4.94% | -3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 7.78% | -6.80% |
Volatility
JHCB vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) is 1.34%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that JHCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHCB | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 4.51% | -3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.43% | 13.37% | -9.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.34% | 17.59% | -13.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.94% | 20.45% | -13.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.84% | 20.45% | -13.61% |
JHCB vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHCB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHCB vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison
JHCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than GABF's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 2.01% | 1.96% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 1.31% | 0.00% |
JHCB John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF | 5.00% | 4.92% | 5.02% | 4.35% | 3.86% | 2.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHCB and GABF have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GABF has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to JHCB (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCB dropped -22.61% vs GABF's -20.86%.
On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 20.10% vs 5.65% for JHCB. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, JHCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 20.10% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for JHCB.
JHCB has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 2.01% for GABF.
JHCB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHCB and 0.10% for GABF.
JHCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHCB and GABF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer