PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHCB vs. JHMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHCB vs. JHMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHCB achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly lower than JHMB's -0.24% return.


JHCB

1D
-0.29%
1M
-1.98%
6M
-1.36%
YTD
-1.01%
1Y
1.55%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
-0.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.72%

JHMB

1D
-0.37%
1M
-1.26%
6M
-0.69%
YTD
-0.24%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
5.17%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$496.05K$369.71K$346.04K
$682.94K$785.88K$842.54K

JHCB vs. JHMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
-1.01%8.02%2.75%8.89%-15.93%-0.80%
JHMB
John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF
-0.24%7.89%3.52%7.21%-10.24%-0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between JHCB and JHMB is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2021

0.67

The correlation between JHCB and JHMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHCB vs. JHMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JHCB
JHCB Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
JHCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCB Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCB Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

JHMB
JHMB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JHMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMB Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JHCB vs. JHMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHCBJHMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.19

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

1.38

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.87

3.42

-1.55

JHCB vs. JHMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHCB Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the JHMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHCB and JHMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHCB vs. JHMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHCB drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, which is greater than JHMB's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCB and JHMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHCBJHMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.61%

-14.53%

-8.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.16%

-3.01%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.47%

-5.42%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-2.43%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-4.72%

-3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

1.21%

-0.13%

Volatility

JHCB vs. JHMB - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) at 1.02%. This indicates that JHCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHCBJHMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

1.02%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.46%

2.87%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.30%

3.80%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.94%

5.75%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.81%

5.75%

+1.06%

JHCB vs. JHMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHCB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than JHMB's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHCB vs. JHMB - Dividend Comparison

JHCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than JHMB's 4.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
5.13%4.92%5.02%4.35%3.86%2.41%
JHMB
John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF
4.86%4.48%4.88%4.04%4.17%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHCB and JHMB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHCB has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to JHMB (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCB dropped -22.61% vs JHMB's -14.53%.

On 3-year performance, JHMB leads with 5.17% vs 5.05% for JHCB. On fees, JHCB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JHMB has performed better with a 5.17% return vs 5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHCB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JHMB.

JHCB has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 4.86% for JHMB.

JHCB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while JHMB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHCB and 0.39% for JHMB.

JHMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHCB and JHMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer