PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHCB vs. JHCP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHCB vs. JHCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHCB achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly lower than JHCP's -0.21% return.


JHCB

1D
-0.29%
1M
-1.98%
6M
-1.36%
YTD
-1.01%
1Y
1.55%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
-0.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.72%

JHCP

1D
0.02%
1M
-1.13%
6M
-0.79%
YTD
-0.21%
1Y
2.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$496.05K$369.71K$346.04K
$5.40M$6.59M$2.64M

JHCB vs. JHCP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
-1.01%8.02%-1.33%
JHCP
John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF
-0.21%7.59%-1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between JHCB and JHCP is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024

0.81

The correlation between JHCB and JHCP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHCB vs. JHCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JHCB
JHCB Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
JHCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCB Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCB Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

JHCP
JHCP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
JHCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCP Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCP Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JHCB vs. JHCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHCBJHCPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.14

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

1.21

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.87

2.93

-1.06

JHCB vs. JHCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHCB Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the JHCP Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHCB and JHCP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHCB vs. JHCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHCB drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, which is greater than JHCP's maximum drawdown of -3.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCB and JHCP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHCBJHCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.61%

-3.06%

-19.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.16%

-2.82%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-2.10%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-0.93%

-7.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

1.16%

-0.08%

Volatility

JHCB vs. JHCP - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) and John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP) have volatilities of 1.09% and 1.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHCBJHCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

1.06%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.46%

3.00%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.30%

4.21%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.94%

4.79%

+2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.81%

4.79%

+2.02%

JHCB vs. JHCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHCB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than JHCP's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHCB vs. JHCP - Dividend Comparison

JHCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than JHCP's 4.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
5.13%4.92%5.02%4.35%3.86%2.41%
JHCP
John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF
4.55%4.79%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHCB and JHCP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHCB has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to JHCP (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCB dropped -22.61% vs JHCP's -3.06%.

On 1-year performance, JHCP leads with 2.62% vs 1.55% for JHCB. On fees, JHCB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JHCP has performed better with a 2.62% return vs 1.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHCB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for JHCP.

JHCB has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 4.55% for JHCP.

JHCB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while JHCP is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHCB and 0.36% for JHCP.

JHCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHCB and JHCP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer