PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JETU vs. OOQB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JETU vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN (JETU) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JETU achieves a -2.48% return, which is significantly higher than OOQB's -18.43% return.


JETU

1D
-6.56%
1M
25.34%
YTD
-2.48%
6M
11.07%
1Y
41.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OOQB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-18.43%
6M
-24.99%
1Y
-27.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JETU vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JETU and OOQB is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JETU vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JETU
JETU Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
JETU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JETU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
JETU Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
JETU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
JETU Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

OOQB
OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JETU vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN (JETU) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JETUOOQBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.94

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

-0.51

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

-0.91

+3.04

JETU vs. OOQB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JETU Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the OOQB Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JETU and OOQB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JETUOOQBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

-0.53

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

-0.41

+0.48

Drawdowns

JETU vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JETU drawdown since its inception was -68.64%, which is greater than OOQB's maximum drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETU and OOQB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JETUOOQBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.64%

-53.44%

-15.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.39%

-53.44%

+4.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.15%

-43.69%

+13.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.52%

-23.26%

-6.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.69%

30.11%

-10.42%

Volatility

JETU vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison

MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN (JETU) has a higher volatility of 26.59% compared to Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) at 0.00%. This indicates that JETU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOQB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JETUOOQBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.59%

0.00%

+26.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.29%

39.39%

+17.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.98%

51.57%

+21.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.60%

58.12%

+12.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.60%

58.12%

+12.48%

JETU vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JETU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

JETU vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison

JETU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OOQB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%.


Frequently Asked Questions


JETU and OOQB have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JETU has higher volatility (26.59%) compared to OOQB (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JETU dropped -68.64% vs OOQB's -53.44%.

On 1-year performance, JETU leads with 41.74% vs -27.35% for OOQB. On fees, OOQB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, OOQB has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JETU has performed better with a 41.74% return vs -27.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OOQB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for JETU.

OOQB has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.00% for JETU.

JETU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Max and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for JETU and 0.75% for OOQB.

JETU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JETU and OOQB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer