PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JETU vs. ITA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JETU vs. ITA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN (JETU) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JETU achieves a 33.50% return, which is significantly higher than ITA's 14.78% return.


JETU

1D
9.11%
1M
-5.14%
6M
15.46%
YTD
33.50%
1Y
97.78%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.53%

ITA

1D
2.68%
1M
-0.85%
6M
6.60%
YTD
14.78%
1Y
26.33%
3Y*
29.56%
5Y*
19.23%
10Y*
15.30%
ALL TIME*
12.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$172.54M$161.73M$179.63M
$63.21K$100.55K$199.95K

JETU vs. ITA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JETU
MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN
33.50%3.88%38.00%-15.80%
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
14.78%48.64%15.81%10.47%

Correlation

The correlation between JETU and ITA is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023

0.61

The correlation between JETU and ITA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JETU vs. ITA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JETU
JETU Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
JETU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JETU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
JETU Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
JETU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
JETU Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ITA
ITA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
ITA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITA Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ITA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITA Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JETU vs. ITA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN (JETU) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JETUITADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.67

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

4.22

+0.70

JETU vs. ITA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JETU Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the ITA Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JETU and ITA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JETU vs. ITA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JETU drawdown since its inception was -68.64%, which is greater than ITA's maximum drawdown of -59.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETU and ITA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JETUITADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.64%

-59.72%

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.39%

-15.82%

-33.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.64%

-15.82%

-52.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.06%

-1.87%

-4.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.65%

-9.42%

-19.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.96%

6.25%

+13.71%

Volatility

JETU vs. ITA - Volatility Comparison

MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN (JETU) has a higher volatility of 21.11% compared to iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) at 7.57%. This indicates that JETU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JETUITADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.11%

7.57%

+13.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.99%

18.47%

+44.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.56%

22.65%

+52.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.39%

20.29%

+51.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.39%

23.31%

+48.08%

JETU vs. ITA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JETU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ITA's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

JETU vs. ITA - Dividend Comparison

JETU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.43%0.55%0.85%0.93%0.95%0.82%1.07%1.54%1.13%0.91%1.07%1.04%
JETU
MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JETU and ITA have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JETU has higher volatility (21.11%) compared to ITA (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JETU dropped -68.64% vs ITA's -59.72%.

On 3-year performance, ITA leads with 29.56% vs 17.24% for JETU. On fees, ITA is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, ITA has been the lower-risk option at 7.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ITA has performed better with a 29.56% return vs 17.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITA is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for JETU.

ITA has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for JETU.

JETU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ITA is Aerospace & Defense. JETU tracks Prime Airlines Index - Benchmark TR Net, while ITA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: Max and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for JETU and 0.38% for ITA.

JETU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JETU and ITA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer