PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYC vs. ONEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYC vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -3.06% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ's 10.72% return. Over the past 10 years, IYC has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 11.11%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.71% annualized return.


IYC

1D
-0.67%
1M
-1.61%
6M
-5.68%
YTD
-3.06%
1Y
-0.35%
3Y*
12.08%
5Y*
5.56%
10Y*
11.11%
ALL TIME*
8.37%

ONEQ

1D
0.10%
1M
-3.41%
6M
9.45%
YTD
10.72%
1Y
23.38%
3Y*
23.14%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
18.71%
ALL TIME*
13.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYC vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
-3.06%7.85%27.54%34.03%-31.78%19.65%24.58%27.36%1.76%19.87%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
10.72%20.89%29.30%45.73%-32.12%22.11%44.87%38.01%-3.18%29.29%

Correlation

The correlation between IYC and ONEQ is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2003

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between IYC and ONEQ has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IYC vs. ONEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYC
ONEQ

Consumer Cyclical

67.8%
11.9%

Consumer Defensive

11.3%
4.3%

Communication Services

10.4%
14.3%

Technology

6.7%
53.3%

Industrials

3.6%
5.7%

Energy

0.1%
0.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.9%

Financial Services

-

2.8%

Healthcare

-

5.1%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IYC
67.8%
ONEQ
11.9%

Consumer Defensive

IYC
11.3%
ONEQ
4.3%

Communication Services

IYC
10.4%
ONEQ
14.3%

Technology

IYC
6.7%
ONEQ
53.3%

Industrials

IYC
3.6%
ONEQ
5.7%

Energy

IYC
0.1%
ONEQ
0.5%

Basic Materials

IYC

-

ONEQ
0.9%

Financial Services

IYC

-

ONEQ
2.8%

Healthcare

IYC

-

ONEQ
5.1%

Real Estate

IYC

-

ONEQ
0.6%

Utilities

IYC

-

ONEQ
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYC vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYC vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYCONEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.23

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

1.86

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.08

6.64

-6.72

IYC vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYC Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYC and ONEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYC vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, roughly equal to the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and ONEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYCONEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.10%

-55.09%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-12.64%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-24.09%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.90%

-35.23%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-35.23%

-0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.72%

-5.49%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.93%

-7.93%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

3.53%

+0.90%

Volatility

IYC vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) is 4.46%, while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that IYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYCONEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

5.70%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

14.25%

-2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.81%

17.84%

-3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.82%

22.41%

-1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

21.79%

-1.88%

IYC vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYC vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than ONEQ's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.51%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
0.87%0.54%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%2.51%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYC and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEQ has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to IYC (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYC dropped -53.10% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.

On 10-year performance, ONEQ leads with 18.71% vs 11.11% for IYC. On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 18.71% return vs 11.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYC.

ONEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.51% for IYC.

IYC is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index, while ONEQ tracks Nasdaq Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYC and 0.21% for ONEQ.

ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYC and ONEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer