PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IXP vs. CCOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IXP vs. CCOR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IXP (iShares Global Comm Services ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. IXP is passively managed, while CCOR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IXP returned 8.96%/yr vs -2.56%/yr for CCOR. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IXP charges 0.43%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

IXP vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXP achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -3.71% return.

IXP

1D
-1.03%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.33%
1Y
18.24%
3Y*
23.77%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
9.33%

CCOR

1D
0.30%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-3.71%
6M
-4.87%
1Y
-5.97%
3Y*
-2.34%
5Y*
-2.56%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXP vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXP
iShares Global Comm Services ETF		0.11%29.27%31.33%38.80%-33.40%12.77%22.16%25.23%-13.67%4.01%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF		-3.71%3.52%-5.70%-11.92%2.51%9.90%4.07%6.03%4.64%3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between IXP and CCOR is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.12

The correlation between IXP and CCOR shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (3 years) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXP vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IXP
CCOR

Communication Services

97.7%
8.7%

Technology

2.0%
16.2%

Real Estate

0.5%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
9.4%

Basic Materials

-

5.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.8%

Energy

-

7.2%

Financial Services

-

17.7%

Healthcare

-

10.8%

Industrials

-

9.2%

Utilities

-

6.3%

Communication Services

IXP
97.7%
CCOR
8.7%

Technology

IXP
2.0%
CCOR
16.2%

Real Estate

IXP
0.5%
CCOR
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IXP
0.2%
CCOR
9.4%

Basic Materials

IXP

-

CCOR
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

IXP

-

CCOR
6.8%

Energy

IXP

-

CCOR
7.2%

Financial Services

IXP

-

CCOR
17.7%

Healthcare

IXP

-

CCOR
10.8%

Industrials

IXP

-

CCOR
9.2%

Utilities

IXP

-

CCOR
6.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Comm Services ETF

Core Alternative ETF

Often compared with IXP:
IXP vs. XLCIXP vs. FCOMIXP vs. IYZIXP vs. VOOIXP vs. QQQIXP vs. IYWIXP vs. VTI
Often compared with CCOR:
CCOR vs. BTALCCOR vs. AIRRCCOR vs. BIMBXCCOR vs. QMNNXCCOR vs. JEPQCCOR vs. VOOCCOR vs. SPY

Return for Risk

IXP vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IXP
IXP Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXP Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXP Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
CCOR
CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXP vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IXPCCORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.25
-0.87

+2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.97
-1.15

+3.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.87

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

-0.69

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.21

-1.59

+6.79

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IXP vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXP Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXP and CCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IXPCCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

-0.87

+2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

-0.23

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.11

+0.23

Drawdowns

IXP vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXP drawdown since its inception was -50.11%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXP and CCOR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IXPCCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.11%

-22.99%

-27.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.26%

-8.75%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-12.31%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.30%

-22.99%

-21.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.30%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.08%

-20.03%

+15.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.92%

-7.29%

-4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

3.77%

-0.26%

Volatility

IXP vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 1.78%. This indicates that IXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IXPCCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

1.78%

+2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

4.96%

+5.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

6.93%

+7.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

11.10%

+7.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.52%

10.75%

+7.77%

IXP vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXP has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

IXP vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

IXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than CCOR's 1.11% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF		1.11%1.07%1.18%1.21%1.11%1.02%1.50%0.73%1.53%0.89%0.00%0.00%
IXP
iShares Global Comm Services ETF		2.98%2.98%1.35%1.24%0.62%1.80%0.95%2.18%4.32%3.41%4.02%3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

IXP and CCOR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXP has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to CCOR (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXP dropped -50.11% vs CCOR's -22.99%.

On 5-year performance, IXP leads with 8.96% vs -2.56% for CCOR. On fees, IXP is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IXP has performed better with a 8.96% return vs -2.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXP is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

IXP has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 1.11% for CCOR.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IXP and 1.09% for CCOR.

IXP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXP and CCOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer