PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWY vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWY vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWY achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 8.49% return. Over the past 10 years, IWY has outperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 19.31%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively lower 18.03% annualized return.


IWY

1D
-0.28%
1M
-4.55%
YTD
1.19%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
22.20%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
19.31%

SPYG

1D
-0.20%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
8.49%
6M
6.97%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
25.40%
5Y*
14.06%
10Y*
18.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWY vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
1.19%18.19%34.89%46.49%-29.91%31.05%39.01%36.20%-0.72%31.69%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
8.49%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IWY and SPYG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009

0.97

The correlation between IWY and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWY vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWY
SPYG

Technology

56.9%
52.1%

Communication Services

12.6%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
8.5%

Healthcare

6.7%
5.9%

Financial Services

5.3%
9.0%

Industrials

3.3%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
1.0%

Utilities

1.1%
1.2%

Real Estate

0.3%
0.6%

Basic Materials

0.3%
0.3%

Energy

0.0%
0.1%

Technology

IWY
56.9%
SPYG
52.1%

Communication Services

IWY
12.6%
SPYG
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IWY
10.5%
SPYG
8.5%

Healthcare

IWY
6.7%
SPYG
5.9%

Financial Services

IWY
5.3%
SPYG
9.0%

Industrials

IWY
3.3%
SPYG
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

IWY
2.8%
SPYG
1.0%

Utilities

IWY
1.1%
SPYG
1.2%

Real Estate

IWY
0.3%
SPYG
0.6%

Basic Materials

IWY
0.3%
SPYG
0.3%

Energy

IWY
0.0%
SPYG
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWY vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWY
IWY Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWY vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWYSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.26

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

1.81

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.23

7.15

-3.91

IWY vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWY Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWY and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWY vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWY drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWY and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWYSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.68%

-67.63%

+34.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.63%

-13.76%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-22.14%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.68%

-32.67%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

-32.67%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.33%

-5.71%

-1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-24.28%

+19.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.24%

3.48%

+1.76%

Volatility

IWY vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) is 6.07%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that IWY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWYSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

7.26%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.54%

13.85%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.28%

17.22%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.60%

21.36%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

20.72%

+0.30%

IWY vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWY vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

IWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than SPYG's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.42%0.68%0.88%0.50%0.71%1.06%1.32%1.26%1.51%1.58%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.50%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IWY and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPYG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to IWY (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWY dropped -32.68% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, IWY leads with 19.31% vs 18.03% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IWY has been the lower-risk option at 6.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWY has performed better with a 19.31% return vs 18.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWY.

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.36% for IWY.

IWY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWY and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWY and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer