IWY vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
IWY and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWY is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 200 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2009. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both IWY and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWY or SCHG.
Key characteristics
| IWY | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.09% | 14.31% |
| 1Y Return | 37.21% | 38.29% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 13.78% | 13.11% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 20.00% | 19.32% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 17.24% | 16.22% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.52 | 2.56 |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.51% | 15.80% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.68% | -34.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.35% | -0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWY and SCHG is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWY vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWY having a 14.09% return and SCHG slightly higher at 14.31%. Over the past 10 years, IWY has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 17.24%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 16.22% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWY vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWY vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWY vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
IWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, more than SCHG's 0.42% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.59% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.44% | 1.56% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 0.82% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
IWY vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWY drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWY and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWY vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 4.92% and 5.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.