PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWY vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWY vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWY achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's 0.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWY having a 19.34% annualized return and VONG not far behind at 18.43%.


IWY

1D
-1.35%
1M
-6.29%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
-1.56%
1Y
14.80%
3Y*
22.18%
5Y*
13.80%
10Y*
19.34%

VONG

1D
-1.22%
1M
-5.82%
YTD
0.16%
6M
-1.35%
1Y
14.32%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
18.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWY vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
-0.18%18.19%34.89%46.49%-29.91%31.05%39.01%36.20%-0.72%31.69%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.16%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IWY and VONG is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.98

The correlation between IWY and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWY vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWY
VONG

Technology

56.9%
54.1%

Communication Services

12.6%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
12.5%

Healthcare

6.7%
6.9%

Financial Services

5.3%
4.8%

Industrials

3.3%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
2.5%

Utilities

1.1%
1.0%

Real Estate

0.3%
0.4%

Basic Materials

0.3%
0.3%

Energy

0.0%
0.4%

Technology

IWY
56.9%
VONG
54.1%

Communication Services

IWY
12.6%
VONG
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IWY
10.5%
VONG
12.5%

Healthcare

IWY
6.7%
VONG
6.9%

Financial Services

IWY
5.3%
VONG
4.8%

Industrials

IWY
3.3%
VONG
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

IWY
2.8%
VONG
2.5%

Utilities

IWY
1.1%
VONG
1.0%

Real Estate

IWY
0.3%
VONG
0.4%

Basic Materials

IWY
0.3%
VONG
0.3%

Energy

IWY
0.0%
VONG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWY vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWY
IWY Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWY vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWYVONGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.16

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

0.89

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.82

2.86

-0.05

IWY vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWY Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWY and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWY vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWY drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, roughly equal to the maximum VONG drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWY and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWYVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.68%

-32.72%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.63%

-16.23%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-23.27%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.68%

-32.72%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

-32.72%

+0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.58%

-8.09%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-4.88%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

5.01%

+0.26%

Volatility

IWY vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) have volatilities of 6.12% and 6.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWYVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

6.05%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

12.56%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

16.13%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.61%

21.46%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

20.91%

+0.11%

IWY vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWY vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

IWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than VONG's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.42%0.68%0.88%0.50%0.71%1.06%1.32%1.26%1.51%1.58%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.48%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, IWY and VONG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IWY has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to VONG (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWY dropped -32.68% vs VONG's -32.72%.

On 10-year performance, IWY leads with 19.34% vs 18.43% for VONG. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWY has performed better with a 19.34% return vs 18.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWY.

VONG has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.36% for IWY.

IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWY and 0.06% for VONG.

IWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWY and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer