IWV vs. FCPGX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX).
IWV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. FCPGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004.
Performance
IWV vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IWV vs. FCPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | -3.33% | 16.96% | 23.49% | 25.82% | -19.28% | 25.54% | 20.55% | 30.66% | -5.43% | 20.97% |
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund | -0.83% | 11.20% | 20.56% | 19.02% | -25.34% | 10.50% | 36.41% | 36.31% | -4.57% | 28.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWV achieves a -3.33% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's -0.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWV having a 13.53% annualized return and FCPGX not far behind at 13.40%.
IWV
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -3.33%
- 6M
- -1.36%
- 1Y
- 18.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.53%
FCPGX
- 1D
- 4.93%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 24.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWV vs. FCPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IWV vs. FCPGX — Risk / Return Rank
IWV
FCPGX
IWV vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWV | FCPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 0.97 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.47 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 1.70 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.19 | 6.35 | +0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWV | FCPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 0.97 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.18 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.59 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.50 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between IWV and FCPGX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IWV vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison
IWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than FCPGX's 6.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 0.98% | 0.96% | 1.08% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.69% | 1.97% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.99% |
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund | 6.44% | 6.38% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 19.27% | 8.19% | 5.31% | 14.35% | 6.88% | 1.53% | 4.32% |
Drawdowns
IWV vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWV drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, smaller than the maximum FCPGX drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWV and FCPGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWV | FCPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.61% | -59.11% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -13.76% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | -39.04% | +13.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.22% | -39.04% | +3.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.53% | -8.84% | +3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -10.77% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 3.69% | -1.09% |
Volatility
IWV vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) is 5.45%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) has a volatility of 9.87%. This indicates that IWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWV | FCPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 9.87% | -4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 16.73% | -7.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.45% | 24.94% | -6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 23.43% | -6.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 22.74% | -4.35% |