PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCPGX vs. FECGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCPGX vs. FECGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCPGX achieves a 25.26% return, which is significantly higher than FECGX's 22.18% return.


FCPGX

1D
1.23%
1M
7.49%
YTD
25.26%
6M
21.54%
1Y
44.87%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
15.78%

FECGX

1D
1.17%
1M
5.93%
YTD
22.18%
6M
18.79%
1Y
42.27%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCPGX vs. FECGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FCPGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
25.26%11.20%20.56%19.02%-25.34%10.50%36.41%6.13%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
22.18%13.04%15.26%18.90%-26.17%2.83%34.41%7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FCPGX and FECGX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.97

The correlation between FCPGX and FECGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCPGX vs. FECGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCPGX
FCPGX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FCPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FCPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FECGX
FECGX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FECGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FECGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FECGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FECGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FECGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCPGX vs. FECGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCPGXFECGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

2.95

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

10.57

+3.45

FCPGX vs. FECGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCPGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the FECGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCPGX and FECGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCPGX vs. FECGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCPGX drawdown since its inception was -59.11%, which is greater than FECGX's maximum drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPGX and FECGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCPGXFECGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.11%

-41.85%

-17.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-14.81%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.69%

-28.45%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.04%

-40.34%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.68%

-15.65%

+4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

4.13%

-0.85%

Volatility

FCPGX vs. FECGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) have volatilities of 7.84% and 7.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCPGXFECGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.84%

7.66%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.31%

16.76%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.24%

22.23%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.68%

24.70%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.94%

27.21%

-4.27%

FCPGX vs. FECGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCPGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FECGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCPGX vs. FECGX - Dividend Comparison

FCPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than FECGX's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCPGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
5.10%6.38%1.37%0.00%0.00%19.27%8.19%5.31%14.35%6.88%1.53%4.32%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.44%0.54%1.25%0.81%0.80%3.43%1.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FCPGX and FECGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCPGX has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to FECGX (7.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCPGX dropped -59.11% vs FECGX's -41.85%.

FCPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCPGX and FECGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer