IWV vs. VTHR
IWV (iShares Russell 3000 ETF) and VTHR (Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 3000 Index, from iShares and Vanguard respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWV returned 14.98%/yr vs 15.06%/yr for VTHR. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VTHR.
Performance
IWV vs. VTHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWV having a 8.58% return and VTHR slightly higher at 8.70%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWV having a 14.98% annualized return and VTHR not far ahead at 15.06%.
IWV
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 8.58%
- 6M
- 7.48%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 11.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
VTHR
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 23.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.48%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.06%
IWV vs. VTHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 8.58% | 16.96% | 23.49% | 25.82% | -19.28% | 25.54% | 20.55% | 30.66% | -5.43% | 20.97% |
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 8.70% | 16.99% | 23.57% | 25.92% | -19.20% | 25.49% | 20.93% | 30.82% | -5.65% | 21.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWV and VTHR is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IWV and VTHR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWV vs. VTHR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWV
VTHR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
IWV
VTHR
Financial Services
IWV
VTHR
Communication Services
IWV
VTHR
Consumer Cyclical
IWV
VTHR
Industrials
IWV
VTHR
Healthcare
IWV
VTHR
Consumer Defensive
IWV
VTHR
Energy
IWV
VTHR
Real Estate
IWV
VTHR
Utilities
IWV
VTHR
Basic Materials
IWV
VTHR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWV vs. VTHR — Risk / Return Rank
IWV
VTHR
IWV vs. VTHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWV | VTHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.69 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.92 | 11.99 | -0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWV vs. VTHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWV drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, which is greater than VTHR's maximum drawdown of -34.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWV and VTHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWV | VTHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.61% | -34.61% | -21.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -8.91% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | -19.36% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | -25.06% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.22% | -34.61% | -0.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.74% | -2.70% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.57% | -4.03% | -6.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 2.00% | -0.01% |
Volatility
IWV vs. VTHR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) have volatilities of 4.84% and 4.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWV | VTHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 4.78% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.97% | 10.12% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 12.87% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 17.39% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 17.86% | +0.55% |
IWV vs. VTHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VTHR's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWV vs. VTHR - Dividend Comparison
IWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than VTHR's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 0.89% | 0.96% | 1.08% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.69% | 1.97% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.99% |
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 1.05% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 1.47% | 1.52% | 1.16% | 1.37% | 1.65% | 1.89% | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, IWV and VTHR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IWV has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to VTHR (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWV dropped -55.61% vs VTHR's -34.61%.
On 10-year performance, VTHR leads with 15.06% vs 14.98% for IWV. On fees, VTHR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTHR has performed better with a 15.06% return vs 14.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTHR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWV.
VTHR has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.89% for IWV.
Both ETFs track Russell 3000 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWV and 0.06% for VTHR.
IWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWV and VTHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer