IWV vs. IWB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB).
IWV and IWB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. IWB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000. Both IWV and IWB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWV or IWB.
Key characteristics
| IWV | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 25.95% | 26.52% |
| 1Y Return | 35.03% | 35.25% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.71% | 9.25% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.02% | 15.43% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.75% | 13.07% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.02 | 3.08 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.03 | 4.10 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.56 | 1.58 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.54 | 4.51 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.84 | 20.21 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.92% | 1.88% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.62% | 12.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -55.61% | -55.38% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.48% | -0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWV and IWB is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWV vs. IWB - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWV having a 25.95% return and IWB slightly higher at 26.52%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWV having a 12.75% annualized return and IWB not far ahead at 13.07%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWV vs. IWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IWB's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWV vs. IWB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWV vs. IWB - Dividend Comparison
IWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than IWB's 1.11% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.69% | 1.97% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.99% | 1.62% | 1.61% |
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 1.11% | 1.31% | 1.56% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.71% | 2.06% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 1.95% | 1.71% | 1.68% |
Drawdowns
IWV vs. IWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWV drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, roughly equal to the maximum IWB drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWV and IWB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWV vs. IWB - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) have volatilities of 4.01% and 3.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.