IWV vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
IWV and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both IWV and IWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWV or IWM.
Key characteristics
| IWV | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.76% | -0.14% |
| 1Y Return | 25.25% | 17.60% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.35% | -2.74% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.39% | 5.88% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.70% | 7.42% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.03 | 0.91 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.08% | 19.79% |
| Max Drawdown | -55.61% | -59.05% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.77% | -14.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWV and IWM is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWV vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IWV achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's -0.14% return. Over the past 10 years, IWV has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 11.70%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.42% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWV vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWV vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWV vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
IWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than IWM's 1.30% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWV iShares Russell 3000 ETF | 1.20% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.69% | 1.97% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.99% | 1.62% | 1.61% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.30% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.26% | 1.23% |
Drawdowns
IWV vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWV drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWV and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWV vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) is 4.10%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that IWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.