PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCPGX vs. FDSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCPGX vs. FDSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCPGX achieves a 18.56% return, which is significantly higher than FDSCX's 15.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FCPGX has outperformed FDSCX with an annualized return of 14.82%, while FDSCX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.84% annualized return.


FCPGX

1D
0.80%
1M
4.20%
YTD
18.56%
6M
16.63%
1Y
37.99%
3Y*
20.82%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
14.82%

FDSCX

1D
0.84%
1M
1.01%
YTD
15.95%
6M
14.53%
1Y
38.89%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
12.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCPGX vs. FDSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCPGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
18.56%11.20%20.56%19.02%-25.34%10.50%36.41%36.31%-4.57%28.99%
FDSCX
Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund
15.95%14.33%14.51%19.46%-18.28%24.76%21.76%30.42%-8.90%11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FCPGX and FDSCX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2004

0.95

The correlation between FCPGX and FDSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCPGX vs. FDSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCPGX
FCPGX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FCPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FCPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FDSCX
FDSCX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FDSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCPGX vs. FDSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCPGXFDSCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

2.32

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.58

3.27

-0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.39

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

4.12

-1.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.29

16.04

-3.75

FCPGX vs. FDSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the FDSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCPGX and FDSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCPGXFDSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.32

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.46

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.59

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.42

+0.11

Drawdowns

FCPGX vs. FDSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCPGX drawdown since its inception was -59.11%, smaller than the maximum FDSCX drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPGX and FDSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCPGXFDSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.11%

-65.47%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-10.04%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.69%

-27.42%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.04%

-30.56%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

-38.43%

-0.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-1.74%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-11.23%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.57%

+0.69%

Volatility

FCPGX vs. FDSCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) at 5.23%. This indicates that FCPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCPGXFDSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

5.23%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.30%

13.36%

+2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.18%

17.85%

+3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.48%

21.63%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.84%

21.87%

+0.97%

FCPGX vs. FDSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCPGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FDSCX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCPGX vs. FDSCX - Dividend Comparison

FCPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than FDSCX's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCPGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
5.38%6.38%1.37%0.00%0.00%19.27%8.19%5.31%14.35%6.88%1.53%4.32%
FDSCX
Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund
0.62%0.72%2.71%0.23%0.12%10.85%1.40%2.13%22.39%10.02%1.63%7.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FCPGX and FDSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCPGX has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to FDSCX (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCPGX dropped -59.11% vs FDSCX's -65.47%.

FDSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCPGX and FDSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer