FCPGX vs. VBK
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK).
FCPGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004. VBK is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.
Performance
FCPGX vs. VBK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCPGX vs. VBK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund | -0.83% | 11.20% | 20.56% | 19.02% | -25.34% | 10.50% | 36.41% | 36.31% | -4.57% | 28.99% |
VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF | 1.01% | 8.50% | 16.50% | 21.45% | -28.44% | 5.66% | 35.44% | 32.75% | -5.70% | 21.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCPGX achieves a -0.83% return, which is significantly lower than VBK's 1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FCPGX has outperformed VBK with an annualized return of 13.40%, while VBK has yielded a comparatively lower 10.55% annualized return.
FCPGX
- 1D
- 4.93%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 24.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
VBK
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 21.17%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCPGX vs. VBK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCPGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VBK's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCPGX vs. VBK — Risk / Return Rank
FCPGX
VBK
FCPGX vs. VBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCPGX | VBK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 0.87 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.36 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.18 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 1.49 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | 5.92 | +0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCPGX | VBK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.87 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.10 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.46 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.40 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCPGX and VBK is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCPGX vs. VBK - Dividend Comparison
FCPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than VBK's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund | 6.44% | 6.38% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 19.27% | 8.19% | 5.31% | 14.35% | 6.88% | 1.53% | 4.32% |
VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.52% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.36% | 0.44% | 0.57% | 0.79% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.98% |
Drawdowns
FCPGX vs. VBK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCPGX drawdown since its inception was -59.11%, roughly equal to the maximum VBK drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPGX and VBK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCPGX | VBK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.11% | -58.68% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -14.56% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.04% | -38.39% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.04% | -38.70% | -0.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.84% | -6.78% | -2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.77% | -10.22% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 3.67% | +0.02% |
Volatility
FCPGX vs. VBK - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) has a higher volatility of 9.87% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) at 8.63%. This indicates that FCPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCPGX | VBK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.87% | 8.63% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 15.43% | +1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.94% | 24.45% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 23.48% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.74% | 22.80% | -0.06% |