IWN vs. SLYV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV).

IWN and SLYV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000. SLYV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. It was launched on Sep 29, 2000. Both IWN and SLYV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IWN vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IWN vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	5.56%	12.40%	7.63%	14.56%	-14.77%	27.96%	4.66%	22.01%	-13.01%	7.69%
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF	4.57%	6.54%	7.28%	14.82%	-11.08%	30.57%	2.68%	24.26%	-12.77%	11.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWN achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly higher than SLYV's 4.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWN having a 9.47% annualized return and SLYV not far ahead at 9.48%.

IWN

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -3.85%
• YTD: 5.56%
• 6M: 8.36%
• 1Y: 28.61%
• 3Y*: 13.77%
• 5Y*: 5.38%
• 10Y*: 9.47%

SLYV

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -3.76%
• YTD: 4.57%
• 6M: 7.29%
• 1Y: 23.43%
• 3Y*: 10.01%
• 5Y*: 4.86%
• 10Y*: 9.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWN vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

IWN

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF

SLYV

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF

Return for Risk

IWN vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWN

IWN Risk / Return Rank: 72
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 66
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 75

SLYV

SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 54
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWN vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWN	SLYV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.00	+0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	1.52	+0.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.20	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	1.49	+0.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.21	5.64	+2.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWN vs. SLYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWN Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the SLYV Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWN and SLYV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWN	SLYV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	1.00	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.22	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.40	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.45	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between IWN and SLYV is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

IWN vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison

IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than SLYV's 2.00% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	1.62%	1.70%	1.80%	2.04%	2.12%	1.48%	1.60%	1.92%	1.99%	1.78%	1.74%	2.15%
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF	2.00%	2.02%	2.30%	2.11%	1.47%	1.94%	1.40%	1.67%	2.14%	5.53%	2.18%	6.55%

Drawdowns

IWN vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, roughly equal to the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and SLYV.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWN	SLYV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.55%	-61.15%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.80%	-15.73%	+1.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.70%	-28.68%	+1.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.08%	-47.73%	+1.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.81%	-6.07%	+1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.22%	-9.00%	-1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	4.15%	-0.67%

Volatility

IWN vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) at 5.40%. This indicates that IWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWN	SLYV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.16%	5.40%	+0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.99%	13.48%	-0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.78%	23.64%	-1.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.53%	22.11%	-0.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.37%	23.97%	-0.60%