IWMI vs. XRMI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI).

IWMI and XRMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWMI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Jun 24, 2024. XRMI is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021.

Performance

IWMI vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IWMI vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	1.35%	14.97%	6.61%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	-2.13%	4.60%	9.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMI achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's -2.13% return.

IWMI

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -4.18%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 4.98%
• 1Y: 26.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XRMI

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -3.63%
• YTD: -2.13%
• 6M: 1.59%
• 1Y: 4.23%
• 3Y*: 6.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMI vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

IWMI

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF

XRMI

Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF

Return for Risk

IWMI vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMI

IWMI Risk / Return Rank: 76
IWMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
IWMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
IWMI Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IWMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
IWMI Martin Ratio Rank: 83

XRMI

XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 30
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMI vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWMI	XRMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	0.62	+0.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	0.89	+1.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.13	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	0.80	+1.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.62	2.72	+6.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWMI vs. XRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the XRMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMI and XRMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWMI	XRMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	0.62	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.26	+0.46

Correlation

The correlation between IWMI and XRMI is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IWMI vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.42%, more than XRMI's 12.78% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	14.42%	14.05%	8.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.78%	12.35%	11.86%	12.62%	12.84%	2.93%

Drawdowns

IWMI vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMI drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMI and XRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWMI	XRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.88%	-15.31%	-8.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.42%	-5.02%	-7.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.80%	-3.86%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.44%	-6.10%	+1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.70%	1.47%	+1.23%

Volatility

IWMI vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) has a higher volatility of 6.95% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 2.68%. This indicates that IWMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWMI	XRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.95%	2.68%	+4.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.89%	4.51%	+7.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.09%	6.88%	+12.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.28%	6.99%	+11.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.28%	6.99%	+11.29%