XRMI vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRMI is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XRMI returned 6.71%/yr vs 13.80%/yr for QYLD. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

XRMI vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRMI achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.

XRMI

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 1.75%
• 6M: 2.96%
• 1Y: 9.48%
• 3Y*: 6.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 9.97%
• 1Y: 23.93%
• 3Y*: 13.80%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 9.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRMI vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	1.75%	4.60%	15.18%	4.22%	-14.06%	2.68%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.88%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between XRMI and QYLD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021	0.74

The correlation between XRMI and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

XRMI vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XRMI	QYLD
Technology	35.6%	53.8%
Financial Services	11.8%	0.2%
Communication Services	11.2%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	12.3%
Healthcare	8.5%	4.2%
Industrials	8.3%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	7.7%
Energy	3.5%	0.6%
Utilities	2.4%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.1%

Return for Risk

XRMI vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRMI

XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 48
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 46

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 88
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRMI vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XRMI	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	2.80	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	3.92	-1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.63	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	4.84	-2.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.70	28.36	-20.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XRMI vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRMI and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XRMI	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	2.80	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.59	-0.22

Drawdowns

XRMI vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRMI drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRMI and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRMI	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.31%	-24.75%	+9.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.02%	-4.97%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.34%	-19.06%	+10.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.06%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.94%	-3.84%	-2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.23%	0.85%	+0.38%

Volatility

XRMI vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) is 0.89%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that XRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRMI	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.89%	1.85%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.21%	7.12%	-2.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.39%	8.58%	-3.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.91%	14.70%	-7.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.91%	15.49%	-8.58%

XRMI vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XRMI and QYLD have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

XRMI vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

XRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.62%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.46%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.62%	12.35%	11.86%	12.62%	12.84%	2.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRMI and QYLD in my portfolio?

XRMI and QYLD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XRMI or QYLD?

QYLD has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to XRMI (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRMI dropped -15.31% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, XRMI or QYLD?

On 3-year performance, QYLD leads with 13.80% vs 6.71% for XRMI. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XRMI or QYLD?

Over the 3-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 13.80% return vs 6.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRMI or QYLD?

XRMI and QYLD have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRMI or QYLD?

XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.62%, compared with 11.46% for QYLD.

What is the main difference between XRMI and QYLD?

XRMI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. XRMI tracks Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.