XRMI vs. QRMI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) and QRMI (Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRMI is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index, while QRMI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Global X. XRMI is passively managed, while QRMI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XRMI returned 6.75%/yr vs 5.94%/yr for QRMI. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

XRMI vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRMI achieves a 3.64% return, which is significantly higher than QRMI's 1.05% return.

XRMI

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 1.10%
• 6M: 2.36%
• YTD: 3.64%
• 1Y: 10.84%
• 3Y*: 6.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.76%

QRMI

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -1.18%
• 6M: 0.51%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 1Y: 7.89%
• 3Y*: 5.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	$103.08K	$122.04K	$134.25K
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	$126.16K	$125.56K	$168.31K

XRMI vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	3.64%	4.60%	15.18%	4.22%	-14.06%	2.26%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	1.05%	3.76%	14.72%	11.73%	-18.50%	-2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XRMI and QRMI is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021	0.69

The correlation between XRMI and QRMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

XRMI vs. QRMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XRMI	QRMI
Technology	38.5%	60.4%
Financial Services	11.5%	0.2%
Communication Services	9.9%	12.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.9%	3.7%
Industrials	8.4%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	6.6%
Energy	3.0%	0.5%
Utilities	2.2%	1.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.6%	1.1%

Return for Risk

XRMI vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XRMI

XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 71
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 80
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 66

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 44
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 45
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XRMI vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRMI	QRMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.09	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	1.48	+0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.21	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	1.46	+0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.99	5.52	+2.46

XRMI vs. QRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the QRMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRMI and QRMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XRMI vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRMI drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum QRMI drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRMI and QRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRMI	QRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.31%	-20.95%	+5.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.02%	-5.04%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.34%	-8.43%	+0.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-2.47%	+2.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.75%	-7.76%	+2.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.25%	1.33%	-0.08%

Volatility

XRMI vs. QRMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) is 1.60%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that XRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRMI	QRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.60%	3.12%	-1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.46%	5.75%	-1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.68%	6.76%	-1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.87%	8.39%	-1.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.87%	8.39%	-1.52%

XRMI vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XRMI and QRMI have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

XRMI vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison

XRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.52%, which matches QRMI's 12.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.56%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.52%	12.35%	11.86%	12.62%	12.84%	2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRMI and QRMI in my portfolio?

XRMI and QRMI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XRMI or QRMI?

QRMI has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to XRMI (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRMI dropped -15.31% vs QRMI's -20.95%.

Which ETF is better, XRMI or QRMI?

On 3-year performance, XRMI leads with 6.75% vs 5.94% for QRMI. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XRMI or QRMI?

Over the 3-year period, XRMI has performed better with a 6.75% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRMI or QRMI?

XRMI and QRMI have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRMI or QRMI?

QRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.56%, compared with 12.52% for XRMI.

What is the main difference between XRMI and QRMI?

XRMI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QRMI is Nasdaq-100.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.