IWMI vs. AMDY

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IWMI returned 33.64% vs 148.62% for AMDY. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IWMI charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for AMDY.

Performance

IWMI vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMI achieves a 18.49% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 105.10% return.

IWMI

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: 0.94%
• 6M: 12.72%
• YTD: 18.49%
• 1Y: 33.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.35%

AMDY

• 1D: 7.78%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 93.68%
• YTD: 105.10%
• 1Y: 148.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 51.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	$19.08M	$22.79M	$23.28M
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	$18.07M	$19.78M	$18.17M

IWMI vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	18.49%	14.97%	6.58%
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	105.10%	53.93%	-18.32%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMI and AMDY is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024	0.53

The correlation between IWMI and AMDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IWMI vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IWMI

IWMI Risk / Return Rank: 87
IWMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
IWMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
IWMI Omega Ratio Rank: 83
IWMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IWMI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

AMDY

AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 87
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IWMI vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWMI	AMDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	2.48	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	3.02	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.39	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	5.42	-1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.56	11.70	+4.86

IWMI vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMI and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWMI vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMI drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMI and AMDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWMI	AMDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.88%	-53.92%	+30.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.40%	-27.59%	+19.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.88%	+7.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.86%	-17.38%	+13.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	12.76%	-10.72%

Volatility

IWMI vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) is 3.93%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 22.16%. This indicates that IWMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWMI	AMDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	22.16%	-18.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.73%	48.49%	-36.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.34%	60.44%	-45.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.67%	48.21%	-30.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.67%	48.21%	-30.54%

IWMI vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWMI vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.50%, less than AMDY's 70.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	70.16%	80.68%	109.98%	6.68%
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	13.50%	14.05%	8.78%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWMI and AMDY in my portfolio?

IWMI and AMDY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWMI or AMDY?

AMDY has higher volatility (22.16%) compared to IWMI (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMI dropped -23.88% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

Which ETF is better, IWMI or AMDY?

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 148.62% vs 33.64% for IWMI. On fees, IWMI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, IWMI has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWMI or AMDY?

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 148.62% return vs 33.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWMI or AMDY?

IWMI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWMI or AMDY?

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 70.16%, compared with 13.50% for IWMI.

What is the main difference between IWMI and AMDY?

They also come from different issuers: Neos and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for IWMI and 1.23% for AMDY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.